Genmab — Januar 2019
-
For nu at være ordkløver, så har retten sådan set ikke afvist sagen, men afsagt den kendelse i sagen (summary judgement) at Morphosys' 3 patenter er ugyldige, hvofor der ikke bliver nogen retssag med jury, da kendelsen er afsagt. Hvis dommeren ikke havde villet afsige en summary judgement, så var der blevet er jury-sag, som Genmab og godt kunne have vundet.
-
Og så er der jo desuden det udestående spørgsmål, som der endnu ikke er faldet kendelse om: Gen/Janss påstår at Mor handlede i ond tro ved ikke at forsyne retten med alle oplysninger. Som de siger derovre: The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
-
Enablement disputes typically come into play when one party has made broad claims in a patent – for example covering a broad spectrum of antibody types against a target – but only provides detail on certain “representative” antibodies. It is used to try to claim ownership of a discovery and block other developers, but can backfire if the other party can convince a court that the patent lacks sufficient detail to be enforceable.
-
-
Tak gentogen. Her står det. Det var da de søgte patentet at de ikke gjorde de ordentligt: The claim said the German biotech mispresented to the Patent Office the reliability of the data for the anti-CD38 antibodies described in its patents in other words it obtained patents in a way that wasn’t proper.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind