Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — September 2020

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.0k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
    JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
    JørgenVarnæs
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #625

    That kind of communication opens the company up to all sorts of litigation if it is not so

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      E_L
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #626

      he did, didn't he? i am even wondering if we asked him in a Q&A?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
        JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
        JørgenVarnæs
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #627

        I wonder if it is the AbbVie deal that has pissed JJ off so much?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          E_L
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #628

          well, he is clearly under that impression, otherwise he wouldn't start the arbitration

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • StockBullS Offline
            StockBullS Offline
            StockBull
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #629

            Mon ikke bare det er et bump på vejen. Kurs 3000 Q1 - 2020 ? . Vurder selv. Kanalen er bare blevet lidt bredere 🙂 https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/proinvestor-dev/forum/boards/86975_bump.JPG

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Offline
              G Offline
              GeorgeBest
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #630

              UBS og Jefferies beholder deres købsanbefaling og målkurser på hhv. 2540 og 2800. Bryan Garnier downgrader til sælg uden målkurs.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                JørgenVarnæs
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #631

                I’m not sure about the 5% share to HALO - but certainly about the prolonged revenue stream

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  MBCruise
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #632

                  Worst case er vel at acceptere andelen af betaling til Halozyme, hvilket vil være ca. 100mio$ ud af 2mia$ royalty på peak ved 10mia$ salg. Hvis Genmab accepterer denne kan JJ vel ikke hævde at det kun er deres patent efter 2030?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mcjean
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #633

                    Tror ikke det er vigtigt her @lahn, det er et tveægget sværd som de har glemt at gardere sig imod. De kan umuligt vinde begge punkter da det ene punkt modsiger det andet eller mere klart de er skakmat. De må vælge hvor de taber mindst. De kan nok vinde begge tviste hver for sig, men ikke sammen er mit gæt for den tvist de vinder først vil blive brugt mod dem selv i tvist 2.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                      JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                      JørgenVarnæs
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #634

                      It seems that JJ wants it both ways - one, they want GEN to pay 5% to HALO - two, they want to cut the royalty period significantly

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                        JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                        JørgenVarnæs
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #635

                        That is fighting talk

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          E_L
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #636

                          on 09.31 i was actually thinking the opposite; i really wonder if JNJ was in the race, and if choosing AbbVie could actually be a reflection on this dispute...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E Offline
                            E Offline
                            E_L
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #637

                            mabye overthinking it...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                              JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                              JørgenVarnæs
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #638

                              Could be all of the above. This kind of crap is poison for the stock - short term and long term

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mcjean
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #639

                                Genmab kan ikke undgå selv at bestemme hvilken tvist de vil vinde er mit bud. Det ved JJ, men de ved også at ligegyldig hvilken de vælger så slipper de for at tabe den anden tvist. Jeg havde gjort det samme, Genmab kan ikke forvente at slippe for royalties og beholde patentet til noget de ikke vil betale til/for. Genmab må vælge og mon ikke hurtig de vælger royalties og så er kursfaldet jo helt ude i hampen.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                  JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                  JørgenVarnæs
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #640

                                  Det ene behøver ikke at udelukke det andet. GEN kan tabe det hele, vinde det hele - og alt der i mellem

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    E_L
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #641

                                    it is part of business JV. Dara is 1 of JNJ's most important assets. IF HexaBody-CD38 is the successor, they will resolve the dispute and carry on is my guess.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      E_L
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #642

                                      But it clearly shows 1 of the reasons Jan was so keen on 50/50 partnerships...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                        JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                        JørgenVarnæs
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #643

                                        ...it does seem like somebody had a bit of a kip when the dara deal was written down

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          GeorgeBest
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #644

                                          Agree E L, and if Hexa-CD38 is as good as Jan believes, we don’t have to worry over the effects after 2030

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger