Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — April 2016

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
2.7k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • dingleberryD Offline
    dingleberryD Offline
    dingleberry
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #2470

    speaking of ema - der har været møde i COMP (19-21 april) og dara blev vendt - http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Agenda/2016/04/WC500205027.pdf

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dingleberryD Offline
      dingleberryD Offline
      dingleberry
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #2471

      det ligner en mundtlig diskussion af marketing authorisation - hvor langt er vi egentlig i processen?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Sukkeralf
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #2472

        Zymeworks lader til at have godt gang i deres teknologiplatforme - det var også em der "stjal" Eli Lilly fokus fra Genmab, da de valgte deres bispecifikke platform istedet for Genmabs.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Sukkeralf
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #2473

          Access denied | www.fiercebiotech.com used Cloudflare to restrict access | www.fiercebiotech.com | Cloudflare

          favicon

          (www.fiercebiotech.com)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dingleberryD Offline
            dingleberryD Offline
            dingleberry
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #2474

            check i øvrigt Empliciti lige under dara i mit link - er de ved at løbe ind i problemer ifht EMA?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dingleberryD Offline
              dingleberryD Offline
              dingleberry
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #2475

              sukkeralf - fedt, hvis vi kan komme i en position til at give GSK nogle prygl

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Sukkeralf
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #2476

                Status of the procedure at the CHMP: Opinion adopted in January 2016.
                After appeal of the sponsor, the COMP adopted a final negative opinion by written procedure
                following its March meeting.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Sukkeralf
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #2477

                  hvem er COMP?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dingleberryD Offline
                    dingleberryD Offline
                    dingleberry
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #2478

                    The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) is the committee at the European Medicines Agency that is responsible for reviewing applications from people or companies seeking 'orphan-medicinal-product designation'

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dingleberryD Offline
                      dingleberryD Offline
                      dingleberry
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #2479

                      det er vist dem, der skal give os det grønne lys

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sukkeralf
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #2480

                        Så er det dermed mere et nej til orphan drug status end nej til godkendelse?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dingleberryD Offline
                          dingleberryD Offline
                          dingleberry
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #2481

                          jeg ved det ikke

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dingleberryD Offline
                            dingleberryD Offline
                            dingleberry
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #2482

                            men det kunne godt tyde på det. Har du styr på, hvilken kommitte, der skal give final go-ahead, hvis ikke det er COMP?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dingleberryD Offline
                              dingleberryD Offline
                              dingleberry
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #2483

                              uuups - her er problemet i COMPs konklusion omkring Elo - In particular, significant benefit versus carfilzomib has not been justified; an indirect comparison of the results from studies CA204004 and ASPIRE pertaining to subgroup analysis, did not justify a clinically relevant advantage, such as improved efficacy or safety in the approved identical indication.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Legolas23L Offline
                                Legolas23L Offline
                                Legolas23
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #2484

                                Godt fundet..

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Sukkeralf
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #2485

                                  Ja det lyder jo ikke så godt

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #2486

                                    En kritisk tråd omkring GENMAB Bull certifikater på vores facebookgruppe: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1552522675046712/permalink/1564130013885978/

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #2487

                                      Kan anbefale alle at melde sig til gruppen. Debatten er seriøs og i voldsom vækst.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Den_FattigeD Offline
                                        Den_FattigeD Offline
                                        Den_Fattige
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #2488

                                        Forstår ikke lige alt jeres (for mig) "sort snak" herinde... derfor spørger jeg lige: har kommentaren fra sukkeralf ( Ja det lyder jo ikke så godt) noget at gøre med genmab ?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Sukkeralf
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #2489

                                          Ikke direkte - men Elotuzumab er en konkurrerende stof til Daratumumab, så hvis det får problemer med godkendelse, så er det jo godt for Genmab.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger