Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — April 2016

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
2.7k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • dingleberryD Offline
    dingleberryD Offline
    dingleberry
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #2471

    det ligner en mundtlig diskussion af marketing authorisation - hvor langt er vi egentlig i processen?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Sukkeralf
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #2472

      Zymeworks lader til at have godt gang i deres teknologiplatforme - det var også em der "stjal" Eli Lilly fokus fra Genmab, da de valgte deres bispecifikke platform istedet for Genmabs.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Sukkeralf
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #2473

        Access denied | www.fiercebiotech.com used Cloudflare to restrict access | www.fiercebiotech.com | Cloudflare

        favicon

        (www.fiercebiotech.com)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dingleberryD Offline
          dingleberryD Offline
          dingleberry
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #2474

          check i øvrigt Empliciti lige under dara i mit link - er de ved at løbe ind i problemer ifht EMA?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dingleberryD Offline
            dingleberryD Offline
            dingleberry
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #2475

            sukkeralf - fedt, hvis vi kan komme i en position til at give GSK nogle prygl

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Sukkeralf
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #2476

              Status of the procedure at the CHMP: Opinion adopted in January 2016.
              After appeal of the sponsor, the COMP adopted a final negative opinion by written procedure
              following its March meeting.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Sukkeralf
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #2477

                hvem er COMP?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dingleberryD Offline
                  dingleberryD Offline
                  dingleberry
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #2478

                  The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) is the committee at the European Medicines Agency that is responsible for reviewing applications from people or companies seeking 'orphan-medicinal-product designation'

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dingleberryD Offline
                    dingleberryD Offline
                    dingleberry
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #2479

                    det er vist dem, der skal give os det grønne lys

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Sukkeralf
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #2480

                      Så er det dermed mere et nej til orphan drug status end nej til godkendelse?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dingleberryD Offline
                        dingleberryD Offline
                        dingleberry
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #2481

                        jeg ved det ikke

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dingleberryD Offline
                          dingleberryD Offline
                          dingleberry
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #2482

                          men det kunne godt tyde på det. Har du styr på, hvilken kommitte, der skal give final go-ahead, hvis ikke det er COMP?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dingleberryD Offline
                            dingleberryD Offline
                            dingleberry
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #2483

                            uuups - her er problemet i COMPs konklusion omkring Elo - In particular, significant benefit versus carfilzomib has not been justified; an indirect comparison of the results from studies CA204004 and ASPIRE pertaining to subgroup analysis, did not justify a clinically relevant advantage, such as improved efficacy or safety in the approved identical indication.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Legolas23L Offline
                              Legolas23L Offline
                              Legolas23
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #2484

                              Godt fundet..

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Sukkeralf
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #2485

                                Ja det lyder jo ikke så godt

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                  Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                  Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #2486

                                  En kritisk tråd omkring GENMAB Bull certifikater på vores facebookgruppe: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1552522675046712/permalink/1564130013885978/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #2487

                                    Kan anbefale alle at melde sig til gruppen. Debatten er seriøs og i voldsom vækst.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Den_FattigeD Offline
                                      Den_FattigeD Offline
                                      Den_Fattige
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #2488

                                      Forstår ikke lige alt jeres (for mig) "sort snak" herinde... derfor spørger jeg lige: har kommentaren fra sukkeralf ( Ja det lyder jo ikke så godt) noget at gøre med genmab ?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Sukkeralf
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #2489

                                        Ikke direkte - men Elotuzumab er en konkurrerende stof til Daratumumab, så hvis det får problemer med godkendelse, så er det jo godt for Genmab.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Legolas23L Offline
                                          Legolas23L Offline
                                          Legolas23
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #2490

                                          Jeg tror, du skal læse tråden i sin helhed, for at få forståelsen med. Du kan ikke tage enkeltkommentarer ud af kontekst og få forståelsen..

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger