Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — April 2016

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
2.7k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • BulderB Offline
    BulderB Offline
    Bulder
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #2464

    Fint link, Jedi, tak for det. Myelomatose.dk http://www.myelomatose.dk/hvad-er-myelomatose/behandling/ har noget lignende (det har kræftens bekæmpelse også) på dansk, men de
    t er ikke helt så opdateret og detaljeret.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      Jedi
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #2465

      Ok, tak for link Bulder

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        Repsac
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #2466

        Det holdt vist OHW. I det mindste i denne omgang.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Joakim_Von_And
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #2467

          Nu går det da den rigtige vej ,,, mon shorterne så småt begynder at købe tilbage

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Legolas23L Offline
            Legolas23L Offline
            Legolas23
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #2468

            En god nyhed - og det hele stikker af. Det kunne være fint med EMA godkendelsen eller godt nyt fra Pollux.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Sukkeralf
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #2469

              Eller en ny god tech deal

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dingleberryD Offline
                dingleberryD Offline
                dingleberry
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #2470

                speaking of ema - der har været møde i COMP (19-21 april) og dara blev vendt - http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Agenda/2016/04/WC500205027.pdf

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dingleberryD Offline
                  dingleberryD Offline
                  dingleberry
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #2471

                  det ligner en mundtlig diskussion af marketing authorisation - hvor langt er vi egentlig i processen?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sukkeralf
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #2472

                    Zymeworks lader til at have godt gang i deres teknologiplatforme - det var også em der "stjal" Eli Lilly fokus fra Genmab, da de valgte deres bispecifikke platform istedet for Genmabs.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Sukkeralf
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #2473

                      Access denied | www.fiercebiotech.com used Cloudflare to restrict access | www.fiercebiotech.com | Cloudflare

                      favicon

                      (www.fiercebiotech.com)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dingleberryD Offline
                        dingleberryD Offline
                        dingleberry
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #2474

                        check i øvrigt Empliciti lige under dara i mit link - er de ved at løbe ind i problemer ifht EMA?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dingleberryD Offline
                          dingleberryD Offline
                          dingleberry
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #2475

                          sukkeralf - fedt, hvis vi kan komme i en position til at give GSK nogle prygl

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Sukkeralf
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #2476

                            Status of the procedure at the CHMP: Opinion adopted in January 2016.
                            After appeal of the sponsor, the COMP adopted a final negative opinion by written procedure
                            following its March meeting.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Sukkeralf
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #2477

                              hvem er COMP?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dingleberryD Offline
                                dingleberryD Offline
                                dingleberry
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #2478

                                The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) is the committee at the European Medicines Agency that is responsible for reviewing applications from people or companies seeking 'orphan-medicinal-product designation'

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dingleberryD Offline
                                  dingleberryD Offline
                                  dingleberry
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #2479

                                  det er vist dem, der skal give os det grønne lys

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Sukkeralf
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #2480

                                    Så er det dermed mere et nej til orphan drug status end nej til godkendelse?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dingleberryD Offline
                                      dingleberryD Offline
                                      dingleberry
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #2481

                                      jeg ved det ikke

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dingleberryD Offline
                                        dingleberryD Offline
                                        dingleberry
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #2482

                                        men det kunne godt tyde på det. Har du styr på, hvilken kommitte, der skal give final go-ahead, hvis ikke det er COMP?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dingleberryD Offline
                                          dingleberryD Offline
                                          dingleberry
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #2483

                                          uuups - her er problemet i COMPs konklusion omkring Elo - In particular, significant benefit versus carfilzomib has not been justified; an indirect comparison of the results from studies CA204004 and ASPIRE pertaining to subgroup analysis, did not justify a clinically relevant advantage, such as improved efficacy or safety in the approved identical indication.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger