Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — September 2020

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.0k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • SolsenS Offline
    SolsenS Offline
    Solsen
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #874

    RBC analyse støtter Genmab. De har tilsyneladende set licensatalen og hvis de refererer rigtigt ligner JNJ en taber.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Raffles
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #875

      I artiklen er der faktisk et link til licensaftalen hos Sec.gov! Se under andet afsnit hvor ordet licensaftale er med rød skrift og tryk på dette - så åbnes nyt link. Her kan også ses royaltysatser mv. Jeg havde nok ikke lige regnet med at denne ville blive gjort tilgængelig:-)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • StockBullS Offline
        StockBullS Offline
        StockBull
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #876

        Nemlig 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          E_L
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #877

          can you post the link here?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
            JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
            JørgenVarnæs
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #878

            Link to agreement - https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1434265/000104746919003334/a2238822zex-10_1.htm

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #879

              thks

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                Raffles
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #880

                @EL - yes, but JV was faster. Enjoy the reading:-)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Offline
                  G Offline
                  GeorgeBest
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #881

                  Dejlig at se RBC aktivt tager stilling til hvad de mener udfaldet bliver. I stedet for skandinaviske analytikere, der bare straks melder ud hvad værst tænkelige scenarie måtte blive...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • StockBullS Offline
                    StockBullS Offline
                    StockBull
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #882

                    Ja det er desværre sådan at nogen kun beskriver den det værst tænkelige senarie unde at fremhæve det mest sandsynlige senarie. Man kunne have dem mistænkt for at gøre det med spekulation for øje

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #883

                      Mioklubben i dag: Genmab fra 17-18 min inde i udsendelsen. https://www.euroinvestor.dk/podcast/millionaerklubben-hvordan-ser-fremtiden-ud-for-genmab

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        E_L
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #884

                        I could find more enjoyable things to read @Raffles 😉 I am curious to find out how long this dispute has been going on already...was it already there when the hexacd38 deal was done..

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          E_L
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #885

                          I find it hard to find merit for JNJ's case in this document, but then again, i am not a lawyer, and JNJ has a whole army of lawyers...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • SolsenS Offline
                            SolsenS Offline
                            Solsen
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #886

                            I think the case came up when JNJ paid royalty for Q220 …

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • BulderB Offline
                              BulderB Offline
                              Bulder
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #887

                              According to 14.4 (A) the case must have been running for a while: "Subject to Clauses 14.5 and 14.6, if any Dispute has not been resolved by good faith negotiations or mediation between the Parties pursuant to Clauses 14.2 or 14.3 above or the Parties have not agreed to mediate, then the Parties shall settle the Dispute by submitting the matter to binding arbitration pursuant".

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • BulderB Offline
                                BulderB Offline
                                Bulder
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #888

                                So first negotiation, then mediation and then binding arbitration.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #889

                                  I doubt that Solsen. Arbitration is the last step and the step that will make it public.Surely they would have wanted to avoid that

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    E_L
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #890

                                    & Bulder typs faster 😉

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      E_L
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #891

                                      Evaluate Vantage Esmo 2020 – J&J goes for broke with lung cancer bispecific - https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/events/conferences/esmo-2020-jj-goes-broke-lung-cancer-bispecific

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • DarvinD Offline
                                        DarvinD Offline
                                        Darvin
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #892

                                        Like El I’m not a lawyer. Har læst artiklerne igennem (især 2, 3, 6 og 7) og man skal sandelig holde tungen lige i munden. Som jeg læser det har RBC ret. Det er svært at læse det anderledes end at Genmab har ret i begge forhold. Ingen reduktion af royalty og ret til royalty i den forlængede licensperiode. Men det står også klart at det bliver juristeri og argumentation omkring årsag. Virker helt klart som et, måske for vovet, forsøg på, fra JNJ’s side at tryne Genmab. Den skulle nok aldrig være

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • DarvinD Offline
                                          DarvinD Offline
                                          Darvin
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #893

                                          endt i Arbitration.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger