Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Oktober 2019

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.6k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sukkeralf
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #1358

    We know 1 has failed in the clinic and we have 6 active in the clinic right now - so thats half of the 14 that reached the clinic. i would guess thats quite good.........and if we are lucky still one or maybe two could still enter the clinic.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Sukkeralf
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #1359

      And and average of maybe 10-20 phase one antibody candidates gets all the way - so lets hope for 2 Janssen bispecifics on the marked 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Sukkeralf
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #1360

        A quick look said 11,5% of the phase one candidates reach marked - but Janssen is quite good so lets count on 1 and hope for 2 and dream about 3

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          E_L
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #1361

          thanks for clearing that up. Which is the one that failed? i have 8 in the clinic in my file

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Offline
            P Offline
            peter12
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #1362

            jnj-61186372 should be safe

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #1363

              actually i am being a bit stupid. it is 6. the last 2 we discussed earlier are really already existing aren't they, combining them with Dara doesn't make it a new duobody....

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Sukkeralf
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #1364

                it was a non-cancer bispecific thats targeted TNF alpha if I remember correctly - was dropped after phase one because of bad pharmaco
                kinetics

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Sukkeralf
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #1365

                  JNJ-61186372
                  Targets: EGFR, cMet /Partner: Janssen
                  NSCLC
                  JNJ-63709178
                  Targets: CD123, CD3 /Partner: Janssen
                  Acute Myeloid
                  Leukemia (AML)
                  JNJ-64007957
                  Targets: BCMA, CD3 /Partner: Janssen
                  Relapsed or
                  refractory MM
                  JNJ-64407564
                  Targets: GPRC5D, CD3 /Partner: Janssen
                  Relapsed or
                  refractory MM
                  JNJ-67571244
                  Targets: CD33, CD3 /Partner: Janssen
                  AML
                  JNJ-63898081
                  Targets: PSMA, CD3 / Partner: Janssen
                  Solid tumors

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sukkeralf
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #1366

                    This one failed: JNJ-61178104 (TNF alpha/IL17A

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • SolsenS Offline
                      SolsenS Offline
                      Solsen
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #1367

                      PSMA er ny for mig at se - target prostata må det være mere præcist. Sort interessant marked.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        E_L
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #1368

                        excellent. up-to-date again. Leaves us only with the question why JNJ went with Zymeworks...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Sukkeralf
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #1369

                          Because Zymeworks is goooooooood 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Sukkeralf
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #1370

                            They have a much more flexible platform - and the format could mean a lot in some cases

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E Offline
                              E Offline
                              E_L
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #1371

                              yes, Prostate cancer, but also renal cell carcinoma for now in the trial

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Sukkeralf
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #1372

                                So maybe just to test another platform on target combinations that did not work with the DuoBody platform

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #1373

                                  fair enough. You always hope a partner that knows the platform well and also the other/newer Genmab platforms, will stick with you...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • SolsenS Offline
                                    SolsenS Offline
                                    Solsen
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #1374

                                    Hvor lang runway har ZYME i deres nuværende cash beholdning ?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Sukkeralf
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #1375

                                      It would be nice to see a HexaBody deal or HexElect deal - but again I think the focus on the CDC mechanism is minor compared to ADCC. But just a gut feeling

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Sukkeralf
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #1376

                                        Det ved jeg faktisk ikke lige på stående fod - indtil videre går den kliniske udvikling stille og roligt fremad, men til næste år startes der registeringsstudier op.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Sukkeralf
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #1377

                                          De har pt Beigene som partner i Asien, men hvis ZW49 skulle vise potentiale som DS-8201, så håber jeg meget de får BP ombord, så de kan sætte gang i møllen for alvor

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger