Genmab — Juli 2019
-
tror ikke helt at Novods holdning kan ændrer Genmabs kurs overhovedet
-
-
Det er standard at der i en licensaftale står at biotech selskabet ikke må udvikle og sælge et stof der rammer samme target (CD38) til andre selskaber. Så big pharma vil så længe den oprindelige aftale gælder, have en veto ret på alle andre cd38 stoffer. Derfor blev aftalen som den gjorde. Og det er altså ikke nogen dårlig aftale. Vi snakker eet stof som stadig er på præklinisk niveau, som genmab kan få 20% royalties på. Samme betingelser som dara. Normalt vil man se mid to high single digit på
-
Nu kalder de det i børsmeddelelsen ganske vist ikke for hex-dara, men hex-cd38. Men da de samtidig taler om en arvtager for dara, vil den hexaboostede version, sikkert ligge meget tæt op ad dara, med lidt ændringer i fc-regionen, som gør hexamerisationen mulig.
-
stoffer på detet niveau....
-
the terms of the agreement allow Genmab to continue to develop and commercialize HexaBody-CD38 for DARZALEX-resistant patients, and in all other indications except those multiple myeloma or amyloidosis indications where DARZALEX is either approved or is being actively developed
-
none of you think it is relevant that JNJ seems to have been an excellent partner for Dara which has spent 100s of millions of $ on development so far, creating the fastest growing myeloma drug; wouldn´t it be possible Genmab actually WANTS to partner with JNJ on this, maybe even feels somewhat obliged...? (i would....)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind