Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Februar 2019

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
3.1k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sukkeralf
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #2369

    First of all, RTOR filing. What I can say is that Janssen is right now filing in different parts -- pieces, the filing to speed up the process, and we think that by next month, that most of the components will be in at the FDA, and then it depends on how quickly the FDA can make up their decision to combi the label

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Sukkeralf
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #2370

      So it could be very rapid. That's probably all I can say about it. And apparently, it's a pretty big file, what I understand from our colleagues at Janssen. But I cannot go into details on how this filing is different from the other Phase III trials, James.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Sukkeralf
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #2371

        But it is going very, very rapid and very well, what I understand. And of course, the FDA needs to like the data, and they need to like the response time of questions that they have for Janssen.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Sukkeralf
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #2372

          Mest af alt den sætningen i midten omkring denne filing være anderledes end andre fase III filinger - er det grundet maintenance eller hvad kunne det være ?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            Sukkeralf
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #2373

            Eller smider de evt Griffin data eller Casiopeia med - var det ikke noget i stil med det de gjorde med Dara-Pom-dex i sin tid ?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • BulderB Offline
              BulderB Offline
              Bulder
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #2374

              Men det kunne tyde på at et eller andet ER anderledes med denne filing. Maia i sig selv er vel ret straight forward. Cassiopeia ligeledes. Så det kunne måske være at de har Griffin-data med. Dét ville i hvert fald være anderledes.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • BulderB Offline
                BulderB Offline
                Bulder
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #2375

                Winkel svarede i november på mit spm.: The GRIFFIN study is a Ph 2 study for which the data will become available in the first
                half of 2019. These data can then be published in a peer reviewed scientific journal
                and may well be included in the compendium guidelines. This could make the
                combination of DARA with VRD reimbursible in the US market...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • BulderB Offline
                  BulderB Offline
                  Bulder
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #2376

                  Det er nok derfor, at de føler sig så sikre på 3 mia 😉

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sukkeralf
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #2377

                    Lækkert hvis der er en lille overraskelse med der - muligvis ikke hurtig godkendelse, men evt godkendelse i Q3

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • BulderB Offline
                      BulderB Offline
                      Bulder
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #2378

                      Fordelingen mellem non-asct og asct er det ikke ca. 60-40%?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • BulderB Offline
                        BulderB Offline
                        Bulder
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #2379

                        I hvert fald er gns.alderen 70 år og 37% er yngre end 65, hvilket gør dem asct-egnede, hvis der ikke er andet der forhindrer det. Så Griffin vil henvende sig til en meget stor del at populationen. http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/bloodjournal/early/2018/07/03/blood-2017-05-693606.full.pdf?sso-checked=true

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • BulderB Offline
                          BulderB Offline
                          Bulder
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #2380

                          I US giver de asct helt op til 70 år, hvis pt er fit.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Sukkeralf
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #2381

                            Synes jeg husker det som 20-25% af alle patienter der er ASCT

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                              Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                              Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #2382

                              God morgen. 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                bibob
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #2383

                                God morgen. 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  Hugininvest
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #2384

                                  Som et apropos til Gen, er der en ny analyse på HALO, som sættes til Outperform og undervurderet. Begrundet primært i Herceptin SC og Darzalex SC 🙂

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • BulderB Offline
                                    BulderB Offline
                                    Bulder
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #2385

                                    Ja, når det regner på præsten ... 🙂

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      transalp
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #2386

                                      Super god analyse, fra peter hildebrandt. Tak EL . vi må nok regne med at blive hårdt straffet på kursen, hvis og når der kommer negative nyheder fra pipeline.. der er meget godt i vente, men vejen bliver sgu ujævn.. go søndag..:)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        JohnW
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #2387

                                        @transalp Har du link til analysen?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • AH2005A Offline
                                          AH2005A Offline
                                          AH2005
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #2388

                                          http://inrater.com/genmab-crowding-out-effekt/

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger