Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Marts 2018

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.1k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • BulderB Offline
    BulderB Offline
    Bulder
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #866

    D-VMp er IKKE nævnt! http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/news/2018/03/news_detail_002925.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c1

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • BulderB Offline
      BulderB Offline
      Bulder
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #867

      Faktisk er ingen af type II variationerne, som er på dagsordenen, nævnt i Highlights. Der må være et eller andet i proceduren, som jeg har overset.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mcjean
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #868

        shit happens........vi må tilbage i minus så:-D

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • BulderB Offline
          BulderB Offline
          Bulder
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #869

          Har skrevet og spurgt Fr. Gravesen.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            E_L
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #870

            cabozantinib, fosaprepitant and evolocumab are type II variations and got positive recommendations. sunitinib also type II starts re-examination. and the others (5 or 6), including Dara are simply not mentioned.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #871

              This is a European Union agency. It could be as simple as a missing form to delay it to the next meeting....

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G Offline
                G Offline
                gentogen
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #872

                I mødedagsorden er nævnt et par underpunkter om Dara i sektion B.5.2. side 14 og 15 af 62. Det ser fredeligt nok ud, men har måske noget med noget at gøre...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  Her_for_at_lære
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #873

                  Side 20: "The proposed new dosing schedule is supported
                  by analyses comparing the current approved
                  VcMP schedule (from 26866138MMY3002
                  [VISTA] study) with pooled modified less
                  intensive ("once-weekly") VcMP schedules (from
                  54767414MMY3007 [ALCYONE],"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • BulderB Offline
                    BulderB Offline
                    Bulder
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #874

                    Rachel Gravesen: I understand it is part of a normal procedure to have this discussion on the agenda at this point and that at this stage of the process it is normal for it not to be included in the Highlights of the meeting.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • BulderB Offline
                      BulderB Offline
                      Bulder
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #875

                      Har åbenbart kun været oppe til diskussion og ikke til beslutning. Mystisk. Der står højt og tydeligt "For adoption" i dagsordenen.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • BulderB Offline
                        BulderB Offline
                        Bulder
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #876

                        De type II variationer, der blev godkendt har en bemærkning i dagsordenen om at supplerende information blev godkendt tidligere. Så sagen er nok den at CHMP har udbedt sig supplerende informationer om DVMp, og dermed har det lange udsigter med en beslutning. Vi skal nok regne med en godkendelse i august, som det blev meldt ud på CC. Beklager, hvis mine skriverier har givet anledning til misinformation.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mcjean
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #877

                          Sgu ikke til at vide hvilke procedurer der bruges i institutionaliserede bureaukratiske offentlige institutter med deres helt egen selvorganiserende kulturelle agenda, hvis motiv normalt kan knyttes til mindreværdskomplekser, men lad det ligge ellers bliver det for kompliceret. Respekt til dig Bulder for din store arbejdsindsats!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E Offline
                            E Offline
                            E_L
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #878

                            'You're fired!' 😛 😛 It is the EU Bulder; we will NEVER know for sure what they will do 😉

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • BulderB Offline
                              BulderB Offline
                              Bulder
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #879

                              Vi får først en forklaring, når referatet bliver offentliggjort, og det bliver det først om en 1½ mds tid.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Offline
                                P Offline
                                pauly
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #880

                                Det er nok god skik at lytte til firmaet selv 😉

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #881

                                  sorry pauly, but that is nonsense. Jan simply dodged the question when asked at the Q&A.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mcjean
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #882

                                    exactly, and by the way i trust Bulder more than Genmab, especially after there little party in december.......jesus!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      E_L
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #883

                                      😛 hang on, I just fired Bulder. Should we get him back?? 😉

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BulderB Offline
                                        BulderB Offline
                                        Bulder
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #884

                                        Don't bother. I resign 🙂

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          E_L
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #885

                                          you sure?? with the salary Helge pays you as Senior Contributor?? 😉

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger