Aktiesnakken — December 2021
-
here is a concern that without a suitable
cumulative impact assessment the overall impact
of this proposal together with certain process
elements of a waste tyre recycling process that is
also proposed, and with other existing and extending
industrial operations would not be properly
evaluated. -
There appears an acceptance by the applicant that a
number of separate assessments would be required
to support an application, and to inform the decision-
making processes and potential planning conditions.
The point is also validly made that additional
regulatory controls in relation to (for example)
COMAH, Environmental Permitting, and Flood Risk
should not be duplicated by planning controls, though
until suitable assessments are undertaken the need
or otherwise for planning conditions cannot -
Spørgsmål til oversvømmelses scenarier da vandet tidligere er gået over kaj niveau https://online-applications.sunderland.gov.uk/online-applications/files/A126898E20EDD6A8A060CCE1384067BA/pdf/21_02262_SCR-DRAINAGE_COMMENTS-1160479.pdf
-
Det punkt må dog være til at imødegå
-
Godt nytår til alle. Lad 2022 være året hvor QF opnår internationalt gennembrud
-
@troldmanden:<br>
QFs ansøgning [Planning Application] "21/02262/SCR" hhv "110/QZTRTGBB01600" ER IKKE en ansøgning om miljøgodkendelse, MEN en ansøgning om vurdering [Screening Request] af om en miljøvurdering/miljøgodkendelse er nødvendig. Indvendingerne går hovedsagelig på at QF skal søge om en miljøvurdering [... an EIA should be undertaken].<br>
EIA = Environmental Impact Assessment<br>
HGV = Heavy Goods Vehicle -
Fra side 5 (Page 1) i ansøgningen: <i>«SLR has been instructed by Quantafuel Sunderland Limited (‘the prospective applicant’) to undertake a formal screening exercise to establish whether a proposed development would constitute ‘EIA’ development.»</i>
-
Planning permission in the United Kingdom: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planning_permission_in_the_United_Kingdom
-
@troldmanden:<br>
Fra side 18 (Page 14) i Sunderland ansøgningen:<br>
<i>«In this respect, the plant is anticipated to be operated in excess of an annual availability of 8,000 hours.»</i><br>
Forstår jeg som at Sunderland bliver konstrueret for 8 000 timer/år produktion, men QF forventer at kunne producere i noget mere end 8 000 timer/år. Fordi man i England har færre feriedage end i Danmark?<br>
I Esbjerg og Skive skal der produceres i 8 000 timer/år: 333,33333 dage * 24 timer = 8 000 timer. -
@troldmanden:<br>
Fra side 16 (Page 12) i Sunderland ansøgningen:<br>
<i>«The plant is designed to process around 110,000 tonnes of plastic waste per year. Of this, it is anticipated that following initial screening, 20% to 25% of the feedstock would not be suitable for the process ..... . From the 80,000t of plastic processed, .....»</i> -
75% til 80% af 110 000 tons = 82 500 - 88 000 tons. Altså op til 10% mere end de 80 000 tons/år Sunderland bliver konstrueret for at kunne processere. Så er mere end 73% av affaldet der leveres til sortering (110 000 tons * 0,73 = 80.000 tons), egnet for pyrolyse, tager Sunderland imod mindre end 110 000 tons plastaffald/år.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind