Skip to content
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto
  • Kategorier
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
  1. Debatforum
  2. Kategorier
  3. Aktiesnakken
  4. Aktiesnakken — December 2021

Aktiesnakken — December 2021

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Aktiesnakken
1.9k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ReservenR Offline
    ReservenR Offline
    Reserven
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #1850

    Godt nytår!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ReservenR Offline
      ReservenR Offline
      Reserven
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #1851

      Official support / objection to this application [QFs Sunderland plant] with Sunderland council: https://online-applications.sunderland.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=QZTRTGBB01600

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • troldmandenT Offline
        troldmandenT Offline
        troldmanden
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #1852

        Der er kommet en række bemærkninger ind fra flere forskellige interesse organisationer. Bemærkninger hvor de ønsker specifikke punkter belyst før der gives tilladelse

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ReservenR Offline
          ReservenR Offline
          Reserven
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #1853

          Norske Finansavisen om QFs to sidse børsmeddelelser: https://finansavisen.no/forum/thread/144176/view/4092842

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • troldmandenT Offline
            troldmandenT Offline
            troldmanden
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #1854

            Det er der sådan set ikke noget odiøst i. Det kommer der til stort set alle ansøgninger. Men om der er mere kød på nogle af dem er svært som udefrastående at vurdere

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • troldmandenT Offline
              troldmandenT Offline
              troldmanden
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #1855

              It is Natural England’s advice, on the basis of the material supplied with the
              consultation, that there are potential likely significant effects on statutorily designated
              nature conservation sites or landscapes and further assessment is required.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • troldmandenT Offline
                troldmandenT Offline
                troldmanden
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #1856

                here is a concern that without a suitable
                cumulative impact assessment the overall impact
                of this proposal together with certain process
                elements of a waste tyre recycling process that is
                also proposed, and with other existing and extending
                industrial operations would not be properly
                evaluated.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • troldmandenT Offline
                  troldmandenT Offline
                  troldmanden
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #1857

                  There appears an acceptance by the applicant that a
                  number of separate assessments would be required
                  to support an application, and to inform the decision-
                  making processes and potential planning conditions.
                  The point is also validly made that additional
                  regulatory controls in relation to (for example)
                  COMAH, Environmental Permitting, and Flood Risk
                  should not be duplicated by planning controls, though
                  until suitable assessments are undertaken the need
                  or otherwise for planning conditions cannot

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • troldmandenT Offline
                    troldmandenT Offline
                    troldmanden
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #1858

                    Spørgsmål til oversvømmelses scenarier da vandet tidligere er gået over kaj niveau https://online-applications.sunderland.gov.uk/online-applications/files/A126898E20EDD6A8A060CCE1384067BA/pdf/21_02262_SCR-DRAINAGE_COMMENTS-1160479.pdf

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • troldmandenT Offline
                      troldmandenT Offline
                      troldmanden
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #1859

                      Det punkt må dog være til at imødegå

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • troldmandenT Offline
                        troldmandenT Offline
                        troldmanden
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #1860

                        Godt nytår til alle. Lad 2022 være året hvor QF opnår internationalt gennembrud

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • karboldK Offline
                          karboldK Offline
                          karbold
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #1861

                          Godt nytår til jer alle 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ReservenR Offline
                            ReservenR Offline
                            Reserven
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #1862

                            @troldmanden:<br>
                            QFs ansøgning [Planning Application] "21/02262/SCR" hhv "110/QZTRTGBB01600" ER IKKE en ansøgning om miljøgodkendelse, MEN en ansøgning om vurdering [Screening Request] af om ​en miljøvurdering/miljøgodkendelse er nødvendig. Indvendingerne går hovedsagelig på at QF skal søge om en miljøvurdering [... an EIA should be undertaken].<br>
                            EIA = Environmental Impact Assessment<br>
                            HGV = Heavy Goods Vehicle

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ReservenR Offline
                              ReservenR Offline
                              Reserven
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #1863

                              Fra side 5 (Page 1) i ansøgningen: <i>«SLR has been instructed by Quantafuel Sunderland Limited (‘the prospective applicant’) to undertake a formal screening exercise to establish whether a proposed development would constitute ‘EIA’ development.»</i>

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ReservenR Offline
                                ReservenR Offline
                                Reserven
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #1864

                                Planning permission in the United Kingdom: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planning_permission_in_the_United_Kingdom

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  Esset
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #1865

                                  Nogen der ved om de producerer idag/aften

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ReservenR Offline
                                    ReservenR Offline
                                    Reserven
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #1866

                                    @troldmanden:<br>
                                    Fra side 18 (Page 14) i Sunderland ansøgningen:<br>
                                    <i>«In this respect, the plant is anticipated to be operated in excess of an annual availability of 8,000 hours.»</i><br>
                                    Forstår jeg som at Sunderland bliver konstrueret for 8 000 timer/år produktion, men QF forventer at kunne producere i noget mere end 8 000 timer/år. Fordi man i England har færre feriedage end i Danmark?<br>
                                    I Esbjerg og Skive skal der produceres i 8 000 timer/år:  333,33333 dage * 24 timer = 8 000 timer.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ReservenR Offline
                                      ReservenR Offline
                                      Reserven
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #1867

                                      @troldmanden:<br>
                                      Fra side 16 (Page 12) i Sunderland ansøgningen:<br>
                                      <i>«The plant is designed to process around 110,000 tonnes of plastic waste per year. Of this, it is anticipated that following initial screening, 20% to 25% of the feedstock would not be suitable for the process ..... . From the 80,000t of plastic processed, .....»</i>

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ReservenR Offline
                                        ReservenR Offline
                                        Reserven
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #1868

                                        75% til 80% af 110 000 tons = 82 500 - 88 000 tons. Altså op til 10% mere end de 80 000 tons/år Sunderland bliver konstrueret for at kunne processere. Så er mere end 73% av affaldet der leveres til sortering (110 000 tons * 0,73 = 80.000 tons), egnet for pyrolyse, tager Sunderland imod mindre end 110 000 tons plastaffald/år.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0

                                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                        Tilmeld Log ind
                                        Svar
                                        • Svar som emne
                                        Login for at svare
                                        • Ældste til nyeste
                                        • Nyeste til ældste
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Log ind

                                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Kategorier
                                        • Seneste
                                        • Etiketter
                                        • Populære
                                        • Verden
                                        • Bruger
                                        • Grupper