Aktiesnakken — December 2021
-
"Table 5 shows a marked difference between the amount of plastic in residual household waste for Denmark and Finland versus Sweden and Norway:
Denmark and Finland have the highest percentage of plastics in the residual
household
waste compared to Sweden and Norway, and the lowest percentage of plastic collected through the packaging waste streams. " -
-
(ældre data)
-
Plastsortering vil dog hurtig forbedres i hele EU efter lovændring / når der er penge i plast. Nok også derfor de sender Sunderland olie til EU.
-
Hovedårsagen til min QF euphori er at der er så meget pres på plastik kedlen i EU. VI har reduceret eksport og lige om lidt stopper vi med at brænde det af.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20200709-01 -
Godt nyt-år
-
Godt nytår.
-
Official support / objection to this application [QFs Sunderland plant] with Sunderland council: https://online-applications.sunderland.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=QZTRTGBB01600
-
Der er kommet en række bemærkninger ind fra flere forskellige interesse organisationer. Bemærkninger hvor de ønsker specifikke punkter belyst før der gives tilladelse
-
Norske Finansavisen om QFs to sidse børsmeddelelser: https://finansavisen.no/forum/thread/144176/view/4092842
-
Det er der sådan set ikke noget odiøst i. Det kommer der til stort set alle ansøgninger. Men om der er mere kød på nogle af dem er svært som udefrastående at vurdere
-
It is Natural England’s advice, on the basis of the material supplied with the
consultation, that there are potential likely significant effects on statutorily designated
nature conservation sites or landscapes and further assessment is required. -
here is a concern that without a suitable
cumulative impact assessment the overall impact
of this proposal together with certain process
elements of a waste tyre recycling process that is
also proposed, and with other existing and extending
industrial operations would not be properly
evaluated. -
There appears an acceptance by the applicant that a
number of separate assessments would be required
to support an application, and to inform the decision-
making processes and potential planning conditions.
The point is also validly made that additional
regulatory controls in relation to (for example)
COMAH, Environmental Permitting, and Flood Risk
should not be duplicated by planning controls, though
until suitable assessments are undertaken the need
or otherwise for planning conditions cannot -
Spørgsmål til oversvømmelses scenarier da vandet tidligere er gået over kaj niveau https://online-applications.sunderland.gov.uk/online-applications/files/A126898E20EDD6A8A060CCE1384067BA/pdf/21_02262_SCR-DRAINAGE_COMMENTS-1160479.pdf
-
Det punkt må dog være til at imødegå
-
Godt nytår til alle. Lad 2022 være året hvor QF opnår internationalt gennembrud
-
@troldmanden:<br>
QFs ansøgning [Planning Application] "21/02262/SCR" hhv "110/QZTRTGBB01600" ER IKKE en ansøgning om miljøgodkendelse, MEN en ansøgning om vurdering [Screening Request] af om en miljøvurdering/miljøgodkendelse er nødvendig. Indvendingerne går hovedsagelig på at QF skal søge om en miljøvurdering [... an EIA should be undertaken].<br>
EIA = Environmental Impact Assessment<br>
HGV = Heavy Goods Vehicle
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind