Aktiesnakken — Marts 2011
-
jeg synes iøvrigt de er gået let henover hvad gældsætningen betyder for selskabet og ders strategi
-
han forlader nok ikke Torm frivilligt
-
det skal da undersøges tilbunds. Et selskab som siger at en rentestigning ikke vil påvirke dem når 80% af deres 10 mia+ lån ligger i
-
variabel forrentede lån synes jeg skylder en forklaring
-
gæld er gift. Variabel gæld er giftigere
-
variabel rente selvfølgelig
-
de kan jo have hedget den rente...
-
de har 9,4mio usd i øgede omk. i2011 hvis renten stiger 1% point
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind