OLIE OG GAS — December 2021
-
Enig Mcjean, men spændene hvad det ender med - håber vi bliver betalt godt, men tvivler Canadiske politiker har jeg bare ingen tiltro til mere.
-
Se det her kan blive interessant for QEC. Nu har EU gennemskuet at atomkraft og naturgas er vejen frem for at opnå klimamålene, noget vi andre har sagt i 15 år. Det kan være det skaber synergi og får Quebec til at vågne op!https://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/verden/2021/12/20/195811414/eu-kommisjonen-legger-fram-sin-gronne-liste-i-januar
-
Det ville jo være fantastisk hvis politikerne i Quebec endelig vågnede op. Skulle det ske går QECs kurs amok. Men jeg frygter at politikerne i Quebec har malet sig op i en krog og kommer til at gennemføre forbudte. Foreløbig tør jeg bare drømme om en hæderlig erstatning.
-
Det er mere kompliceret end som så. De ville starte en retssag op i 2016-17 da Qec mente forbuddet var ulovligt, men de valgte at afvente til politikerne fandt ud af hvad de ville. Hvis det ender med kompensation så vi de samtidig føre retssag for manglende indtægter i 5 år. Hvis de får medhold i at det var ulovligt så bliver beløbet så stort at de nærmest bliver presset til at lade dem hive gassen op. Men måske de tør at gamble.
-
godt spørgsmål, mon ikke de trækker det ud så længe de kan, lige indtil de bliver sagsøgt. Jeg tror QEC fornuftigt nok lader staten spille første kort fordi hvis de farer i flæsket på staten med retssager så vinder de mindre end hvis gassen går igennem, men de må være tæt på en afslutning, mener der snart er valg.
-
The 2 Safest Oil Dividends Right Now https://www.proinvestor.com/investornyt/754890/the-2-safest-oil-dividends-right-now
-
Hypen kører ret vildt i Norge på Questerre Energy. Det begynder lidt at ligne gamle dage.
-
Sakset fra Stockhouse: From Jason You are correct. I dont think the investors realize that the downside for the situation in Quebec is that we get $175MM (~$0.40/share). The upside is we get fair value or in excess of $1,000-$2,000 MM ($2.30-$4.60/share).
-
Jason siger endvidere:This is on top of the existing production. Regarding our court case, we put this on hold while we were negotiating with the government for our pilot. But the court win by Utica Resources (https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/utica-resources-court-victory-means-122200926.html) confirmed that our legal position was correct.
-
As you may remember the purpose of our case was to have the Court confirm that the regulations introduced in June 2018 (the increased distance for setbacks from waterways and the fracturing ban) were invalid. With the announcement of a ban on fossil fuel production, we will wait and see what rights the government is taking away or if they will let us produce clean gas.
-
If they do not allow us to produce gas with zero emissions or propose sufficient compensation if they are expropriating all rights (including carbon capture) then we will file a fresh court claim for disguised expropriation for what we expect will be several billion dollars.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind