Genmab — December 2024
-
der er en stigende debat om, hvordan sundhedssektoren og store medicinalfirmaer, der ikke integrerer AI i deres processer, kan miste konkurrenceevne. AI har potentiale til at revolutionere forskning, diagnose og behandling, hvilket kan give dem, der omfavner teknologien, en betydelig fordel. Investorer er ofte på udkig efter virksomheder, der innoverer og tilpasser sig nye teknologier, hvilket kan påvirke aktiekurserne i fremtiden. Håber Genmab køre fuld skrue m.h.t at implementere AI
-
Genmab vil udvide AI-afdeling
Hisham Hamadeh, der er global chef for datavidenskab og AI i Genmab, forventer at 2025 bliver et vendepunkt.
(medwatch.dk)
-
ASH24 718 Safety and Efficacy of Mim8 Prophylaxis Administered Once Every Two Weeks for Patients with Hemophilia A with or without Inhibitors: Interim Analysis of the FRONTIER4 Open-Label Extension Study https://ash.confex.com/ash/2024/webprogram/Paper198617.html
-
Tadashi Matsushita, MD, PhD: Reducing Treatment Burden in Hemophilia A - findings from the OLE FRONTIER4 study of Mim8. https://www.hcplive.com/view/matsushita-reducing-treatment-burden-hemophilia-a
-
ASH24 1212 Mim8 Prophylaxis Beyond Bleeding: Investigating Multifaceted, Patient-Reported Outcomes for Hemophilia A in the FRONTIER2 Study https://ash.confex.com/ash/2024/webprogram/Paper198395.html
-
Mim8 Improved Patient Outcomes in Hemophilia A in FRONTIER2 Trial https://www.rarediseaseadvisor.com/news/mim8-improved-patient-outcomes-in-hemophilia-a-in-frontier2-trial/
-
Tri-specific Antibody SAR442257 in RRMM - further development halted
-
This Phase 1 study of SAR'257 showed an anti-tumor response in a small number of pts from the rrMM and rrNHL cohorts. Due to safety concerns, in particular high rates of EBV and CMV reactivation and recurrent episodes of CRS in the higher dose levels, the study was terminated during dose escalation
-
ASH24 T Cells from CLL Patients on Venetoclax Mount Potent Cytotoxic Responses in
Combination with Epcoritamab, a CD20/CD3 Bispecific Antibody https://www.postersessiononline.eu/173580348_eu/congresos/ASH2024/aula/-SUN_3231_ASH2024.pdf https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/144/Supplement 1/3231/533852/T-Cells-from-CLL-Patients-on-Venetoclax-Mount -
further ASH24 presentations /posters via https://www.genmabmedicalaffairs.com/congress?filv1=21
-
i have had something like this in the back of my mind as well. it may not be a binary yes or no decision, there may be a gray zone where either JNJ or Genmab tries to adjust the agreement... but that really is a futile discussion for now, until we'll hear what happens
-
We don't know that. I argued here before that it may very well be that it is actually more valuable in the hands of genmab. But at a greater risk. But only genmab has a reasonable insight into this. My preference for now is for jnj to opt in as that
may be most beneficial for short term stock prices -
Helge har også fint argumenteret i én af sine videoer. At JnJ nok ikke ville kunne have råd til at sige nej. I så fald hvis hexabody viser sig at være bedre end dara. Det jeg har fundet og skrevet i mine noter fra et clinical studie om hexabody er begrænset, da det jo var en lille kohorte. Men at der er en tolerabel bivirkningsprofil. Neutropeni var den hyppigste. Og den er at behandle (Ser man også ved andre patienter).
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind