Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Januar 2018

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
2.4k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #2279

    God morgen. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      rex_pacis
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #2280

      God morgen 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        bibob
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #2281

        God morgen. 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          transalp
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #2282

          go morgen 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            E_L
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #2283

            Interview with Orlowski, MD Anderson Cancer Center, early january, don't think it was posted here yet - https://www.myelomacrowd.org/full-show-myelomas-future-in-2018-with-robert-z-orlowski-md-phd-md-anderson-cancer-center/

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #2284

              when talking about VMP-dara first line, he mentioned " It probably will lead to an FDA approval of daratumumab for this particular patient population who’s not transplant eligible, but it may also allow some of us to use daratumumab up front with other combinations"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                E_L
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #2285

                would that even be allowed? surely they could then only use it upfront with VMP?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • BulderB Offline
                  BulderB Offline
                  Bulder
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #2286

                  I was wondering if some docs would be tempted to simply pull out melphalan, as it is obsolete as some say.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Offline
                    E Offline
                    E_L
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #2287

                    yes, i remember you mentioning that. hopefully vdWinkel can answer. Orlowski seems to even suggest broader, but maybe i am reading to much into it

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Sukkeralf
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #2288

                      Im sure Jan can´t speak about off label use of any kind

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        E_L
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #2289

                        no, i guess you are right. but I think Bulder was gonna ask him if melphalan could be pulled if i remember correct? Or would you already consider that "off lable use"?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Offline
                          G Offline
                          gentogen
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #2290

                          From the FDA perspective, once the FDA approves a drug, healthcare providers generally may prescribe the drug for an unapproved use when they judge that it is medically appropriate for their patient. https://www.fda.gov/ForPatients/Other/OffLabel/ucm20041767.htm

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mcjean
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #2291

                            Enten må de kæmpe for shorten og øger jævnligt eller også ser vi snart en 10% melding eller ny 5% melding, spændende. Shortsquezze bliver også mere og mere sandsynligt når man vælger at lege med ilden, der er intet i kursen hverken i TA eller andre A'er der kan legitimere shorten. At shorte så stort et beløb i en exploreaktie kan kun forklares ud fra at shorteren tror på total fiasko for virksomheden. For selv en markedskorrektion kan prelle af på en explorevirksomhed, hvis nyheder times eller?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mcjean
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #2292

                              Det ville være klart bedre at shorte indeks eller defensive aktier hvis de tror på en markedskorrektion, så jeg læser det som de forventer fiasko eller "spiser" lidt med den ene hånd og køber massivt op med den anden. Andre forslag?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Sukkeralf
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #2293

                                Ved en markedskorrektion vil "explorevirksomheden" få flere tæsk

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Sukkeralf
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #2294

                                  Genmab ligger jo et sted midt imellem pt, så svært at sige hvor hårdt den rammes - det skulle lige være fordi der er taget forskud på omsætningen

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mcjean
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #2295

                                    I denne, intet "nyt" er indregnet i kursen, den kører på frihjul. Vi kan diskutere om vi så skal placere den i defensivpuljen, men jeg hælder mest til en af de 2 teorier

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mcjean
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #2296

                                      Normalt når exploreaktier er bygget på luft så falder de meget, men her hersker Dara, det giver ingen mening.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mcjean
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #2297

                                        Luftkastellerne Zealand og Bava ville falde enormt meget vil jeg tro, men ikke Genmab, de har et solidt fundament langt ud i fremtiden, de skal ikke have finansieret forskningen og lave emissioner, de kan endda finde mange nye veje at gå i forskningen eller opkøbe uden det burde påvirke kursen negativt, måske en fabrik?, men.....næh nej, så hvad er motivet?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • BulderB Offline
                                          BulderB Offline
                                          Bulder
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #2298

                                          tak for den, gentogen

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger