Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Februar 2017

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
3.0k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • SolsenS Offline
    SolsenS Offline
    Solsen
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #2198

    Dejligt at de siger 20% på salg over $3 bn

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SolsenS Offline
      SolsenS Offline
      Solsen
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #2199

      Det bliver dejligt store beløb efter 2018 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
        Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
        Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #2200

        I morgen kl 15 afholder vi
        online Q&A med Genmabs CEO Jan van de Winkel på vores webside. Det er helt unikt, at vi privatinvestorer får direkte adgang til ledelsen i Europas største biotekselskab (verdens bedste aktie de seneste fem år). Stil dine spørgsmål på engelsk til Genmab i vores Q&A chat nu. Transscriptet læses af mange investorer over hele verden.
        Har du brug for min hjælp til at stille dine spørgsmål kan du ringe til mig på kontoret fra kl. 6 i morgen på 28556430. Jeg vil så guide dig

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SolsenS Offline
          SolsenS Offline
          Solsen
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #2201

          De kommer marginalt ud med højere royalty af 2017 end 12%, men må ikke guide med denne. Very strange agreement with JNJ not to disclose !

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mobbyduck1
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #2202

            er lidt mere nervøs for ham "japaneren", de lige har ansat fra Janssen. Hvordan passer det lige ind??

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mobbyduck1
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #2203

              JVW nævnte det i indledninge
              n i dag

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                ROI_-_David_Mygind
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #2204

                A few comments: We are in my view looking at an acceptable guidance which seems to be well in line with what could reasonably be expected given the circumstances.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                  ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                  ROI_-_David_Mygind
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #2205

                  What is more interesting is that Genmab now specifies why the milestone of ”entering commercial partnerships” wasn't fully achieved in 2016. The company kindly informs us that the aim was to enter at least 2 commercial agreements meanwhile only one (minor) was landed (with Gilead)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                    ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                    ROI_-_David_Mygind
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #2206

                    he targeted milestone of ”commercial" agreements is unfortunately not being reiterated for 2017. Genmab is now merely expecting ”technology” collaborations. This implies that entering simple non-monetary explorative research agreements also now allows Genmab to "tick the box" at the end of the year. Yes, I acknowledge that this is a detail and yes I’m also jumping to strong conclusions. But, we have essentially waited for years without seeing any significant signs of commercial potential beyond

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                      ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                      ROI_-_David_Mygind
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #2207

                      the massive JnJ collaboration. This meanwhile it seems like money is being thrown after competing biotech firms in lucrative deals on bi-specific technology platforms. However, it is still worse that the new articulation clearly shows that any negotiations efforts (or prospects) from last year must have stranded. There is simply no other reason for changing such important words that have been repeatedly published in the exact same fashion quarter after quarter for years now.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                        ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                        ROI_-_David_Mygind
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #2208

                        I have previously expressed my scepticism in particularly after Novartis when to Xencor and essentially slapped Genmab in the face by entering a rather big commercial deal after prolonged research sniffing by Genmab.We are being told that Duobody is world-class and that we must just be patient as big pharma will eventually wake up and "smell the coffee" as they scramble to sign commercial deals accepting the co-ownership that Winkel keeps demanding.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                          ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                          ROI_-_David_Mygind
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #2209

                          However, the new downplayed narrative makes me even more sceptical that the requirement of opt-in is ostentatious. Genmab is simply falling behind rapidly advancing clinical research in competing biotech companies that were willing to offer better deal terms. Remember it is the early birds that catches the worms even if they are not the best hunters !!!!!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                            ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                            ROI_-_David_Mygind
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #2210

                            Let me hurry up and underline that I remain bullish. I guess it is okay to be bullish on Darzalex plus the proprietary pipeline meanwhile growing increasingly sceptical on commercial grand-standing with regards to the technology platforms that in my humble view still requires one more profound commercial partnership to have the potential fully validated.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              JDB
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #2211

                              Thank you for sharing your thoughts David. I would like another commercial partnership to be announced during 2017, but I am starting to doubt it will happen anytime soon. I hope my doubts are put to shame 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                                ROI_-_David_MygindR Offline
                                ROI_-_David_Mygind
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #2212

                                Well see a few mistakes, it went a bit too fast, but I guess the meaning will transpire..

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                  Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                  Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #2213

                                  Thank you for sharing your thoughts, David.
                                  .I agree on most. If you have any questions to mr. Jan van der Winkel please do not hesitate to share them with us all tomorrow in the Q&A
                                  If you have any questions regarding the procedure please do not hesitate to contact me at hl@
                                  proinvestor.com Phone: +45 28 55 64 30
                                  Thank you in advance. 🙂

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    E_L
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #2214

                                    update reuters article, now $13bn http://www.reuters.com/article/genmab-results-idUSL8N1G77A1?type=companyNews&feedType=RSS&feedName=companyNews

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      JKY_VH
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #2215

                                      thank you E L.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        mobbyduck1
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #2216

                                        Access to this page has been denied

                                        px-captcha

                                        favicon

                                        (seekingalpha.com)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          mobbyduck1
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #2217

                                          @el

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger