Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Oktober 2019

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.6k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #939

    🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #940

      https://ir.genmab.com/news-releases/news-release-details/chmp-issues-positive-opinion-recommending-darzalexr-2

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
        Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
        Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #941

        Går der ikke et par måneder efter anbfalingen før en eventuel endelig godkendelse udmeldes?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • BulderB Offline
          BulderB Offline
          Bulder
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #942

          60 dage mener jeg

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
            Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
            Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #943

            Det bliver til jul. 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • BulderB Offline
              BulderB Offline
              Bulder
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #944

              Men det er jo ikke en "europæisk" kombination. Ville have været mere relevant med Cassiopeia. Alcyone er i forvejen godkendt. Cassiopeia blev indsendt til EMA 27/3 i år.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                E_L
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #945

                it was on the agenda and it went through PRAC earlier this month, so don't know why it didnt get recommended. Unfortunately it takes a few months before we will see the full minutes of the meeting...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • BulderB Offline
                  BulderB Offline
                  Bulder
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #946

                  We've seen that before, that even if it's on the agenda, they don't nescesssarily reach a conclusion.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • BulderB Offline
                    BulderB Offline
                    Bulder
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #947

                    There was no negative opinion either, so next time.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Offline
                      E Offline
                      E_L
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #948

                      no , you are correct, there wasn't. hopefully next month then.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        E_L
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #949

                        i think they stopped recruiting Cassiopeia summer last year already, so i bet there are a lot of transplant eligible patients waiting to get on this
                        ...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • BulderB Offline
                          BulderB Offline
                          Bulder
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #950

                          I wonder if they are considering a limitation of the indication. We have this problem with Cassiopeia as well as Griffin, that high risk pts don't really benefit from adding dara. In Cassiopeia they do benefit a little, but that is because VTd is a "weaker" combination. In Griffin HR-pts don't benefit at all, as VRd is a better combination. So for 15% of pts it would be waste of money to add dara.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BulderB Offline
                            BulderB Offline
                            Bulder
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #951

                            That said, it's still early days with Griffin. It could be better over time. And Griffin is only a small study. Perseus will show us how things really are concerning HR pts.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E Offline
                              E Offline
                              E_L
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #952

                              Are you suggesting JNJ would put a limitation? I doubt they'll do that.... But I agree MD's will be less likely to choose it for HR patients

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • BulderB Offline
                                BulderB Offline
                                Bulder
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #953

                                Voorhees himself has spoken about it. Be cautious with HR, if you start to use D-VRd now already. No not JnJ. The authorities.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #954

                                  do you think there is enough sub-data for them to do that already?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • BulderB Offline
                                    BulderB Offline
                                    Bulder
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #955

                                    For standard-risk, yes. Or what do You mean?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      E_L
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #956

                                      i was thinking if there were enough patients in that subgroup HR to make that conclusion, but there are i think, just checked https://multiplemyelomahub.com/medical-information/imw-2019-subgroup-analysis-cassiopeia

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • E Offline
                                        E Offline
                                        E_L
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #957

                                        the press release from Janssen https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20191018005289/en/CHMP-Grants-Positive-Opinion-Expanded-Janssen’s-Darzalex®▼

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • BulderB Offline
                                          BulderB Offline
                                          Bulder
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #958

                                          And in Griffin as well: Dr. Voorhees noted that D-RVd was favored across all subgroups for MRD negativity and stringent compete response, except among patients with high-risk cytogenetics and stage III disease. https://www.mdedge.com/hematology-oncology/article/208465/multiple-myeloma/combo-could-be-new-standard-transplant-eligible

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger