Aktiesnakken — November 2009
-
hese gains, though, were bought at the price of increased toxicity, with severe hematologic toxicity up from 39% to 55% of patients in the i
-
ok ser faktisk de var lunkne allerede dengang
-
he glaring fact is that rituximab by itself, at conventional doses, is very inactive in CLL
-
The glaring fact is that rituximab by itself, at conventional doses, is very inactive in CLL
-
måske beater Arzerra Ritux bigtime i CLL
-
for fanden da vi vidste da ikke noget om at de ikke var blevet godkendt
-
er ritux overhovedet godkendt i CLL??
-
know your competitor
-
men i følge artiklen er det kun nhl og ra det er godkendt i. Det er dog også de 2 største indikationer
-
troldman CLL har 250.000 patienter...det er rigeligt
-
men hvad kan vi lægge i det???
-
vi er godkendt i 3rdline
-
de bliver ikke (måske) godkendt i 1st line, what??
-
reducerer det ikke vores chancer for at blive godkendt i 1st line, var vores fase 2 ikke sammenlignelige, men kan det være bivirkninger?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind