Skip to content
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto
  • Kategorier
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
  1. Debatforum
  2. Kategorier
  3. Genmab
  4. Genmab — Februar 2025

Genmab — Februar 2025

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
699 Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sukkeralf
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #48

    At en partner er med til at vallidere et stof vil for mig altid være mere positivt

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      lahn1
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #49

      LOL uha det er sgu et dårligt eksempel du lige hiver frem der. Enig det hjælper på sandsynlighed for succes at gen1042 har BNTX med. Jeg tror dog at der ifm med gen1046 learnings eller lige før gen1046 data, var noget der kunne ligne en nulstilling af gen1042 forsøget. De lagde mange nye patienter til, og med det også noget der kunne ligne en ny tidslinje. Men håber da Jan har er troværdig.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        E_L
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #50

        JPMorgan So what do you still need to see for GEN1042? What's the missing data point

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          E_L
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #51

          Jan - So the data we are waiting for is duration, duration of responses, and that takes time. Unfortunately, that takes time. And actually, the more time it takes probably the better it is. But we also want to say that the market is restless, and we also did our partner biontech, because we're both fully invested in that molecule. We're very excited about that molecule, James.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            E_L
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #52

            So we fully believe that we will continue with working on that molecule -- but we have to evaluate right now. I think I spoke about frontline head and neck cancer because that's where we have most of the data, but we also have data in other cancers.
            We think that, that's a fantastic immune activator also to use potentially in combination with ADC.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #53

              And did it take longer? Yes. That is one of the differences, Jim, between ADCs and immune oncology molecules. The IO molecules. We now know -- take a long time and are very complex.

              The biology is very complex

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                E_L
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #54

                And then on top of that, bispecific antibodies like these have bell-shaped curves, so very complex kinetics. So it takes a lot more time than ADC.

                So I think the mix is actually quite ideal when you have both access to immuno-oncology molecules and different types of ADCs. You can actually come to combination regimens, which are completely chemo-free and potentially much better treatments

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Sukkeralf
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #55

                  Thanks E L

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sukkeralf
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #56

                    Can you do the same for Jans answer to the CD38 question about plan if Janssen do not take the option

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      lahn1
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #57

                      Tak EL, Lad so håbe Jan har ret ( at DoR er lang) ihverfald at der fra trial start er gået laaang tid. Men jeg ser det ikke udelukkende positivt at han "allerede" snakke kombination med ADC. Lægger han op til en kombi behandling, er effekten for lille ? Kommer effekten for sent ?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sukkeralf
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #58

                        Han har tidligere sagt, at GEN1042 altid har været tiltænkt som en kombinationsprodukt - derfor må der gerne være lidt effekt alene

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Offline
                          G Offline
                          gentogen
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #59

                          Det meget store Gen1042 fase 1/2 er i dag opdateret til "active/not recruiting" på CT

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G Offline
                            G Offline
                            gentogen
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #60

                            https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04083599?term=Gen1042&rank=3

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E Offline
                              E Offline
                              E_L
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #61

                              JPMorgan HexaBody-CD38 -But if they were not top in, could you potentially still develop the asset in some areas yourself? And could you even renegotiate with them to have more or freedom to where you develop the asset as well?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Offline
                                E Offline
                                E_L
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #62

                                Jan -I mean as per the contract, yes, we can develop the molecule of cells if the J&J would decide not to opt in but not any indications where daratumumab is on the market or where it's in late-stage clinical development. That means other indications in multiple myeloma. There's still some areas left where daratumumab doesn't work or stopped working. We can potentially think about other cancers like AML, diffuse line banner, where we have seen some very good preclinical data with this molecule.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #63

                                  Another potential is solid tumors book.
                                  And the reason that I mentioned that, James, is that the antibody, which is part of HexaBody-CD38 is a very good block of the ecto-enzymatic activity of the CD38 molecule, which is involved in the creation of adenosine. Adenosine is an immunosuppressive molecule. So potentially, this antibody is much better immune activator than daratumumab. It could be a key reason to use it in combination with checkpoint targeted molecules based on preclinical data.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    E_L
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #64

                                    Finally, this could be a molecule which is of important for treatment of I&I or autoimmune diseases and inflammatory diseases because of the that daratumumab is known to be actually pretty active in some of the inflammatory diseases. But this is all speculation, let's first wait on the J&J optinn
                                    decision.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      E_L
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #65

                                      Absolutely, yes, and we have renegotiated contracts before, like the GSK contract.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • E Offline
                                        E Offline
                                        E_L
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #66

                                        Q Would you be in a position to say, right, we're really like taking this into clinical development or would it more be we now need to do some very early exploratory trials because you just don't know that much yet about how well it would work, say, outside the DARZALEX indications?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          E_L
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #67

                                          Jan You definitely need to look at safety and you probably need a subcutaneous formulation, I think, for many of these indications because what you see the trend is with antibody medicines that more and more of them are formulated formulations and definitely in multiple myeloma that is the situation. But also, of course, in automimmune
                                          diseases. I mean, and that needs to be a next step, I think, once you decide on developing that program.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Kategorier
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper