Hvad er vigtigt?
-
New York vil have mere offhore. Det får de da vist ikke uden PTC.
Kopi af artikel:
New York State in 2013 to study possible offshore wind sites
A task force created by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is recommending that the state's research and development arm work with other agencies to further study potential offshore sites for wind energy development.
"Offshore wind development in New York is best achieved by completing resource characterization, technical assessments, and policy and economic analysis for broad-scale, market-based development and delivery of this resource," says a 116-page plan for adding up to 3.2GW of new electric generation and transmission capacity in the state.
It calls for the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) to initiate the offshore studies this year and complete them by 31 December 2013.
Cuomo's interagency Energy Highway Task Force directs NYSERDA to work with state departments and electric utilities, US Energy and Interior Departments, and private developers to "establish appropriate environmental and other research study protocols, and initiate site assessment and other relevant research activities" for offshore wind.
It also instructs NYSERDA to look at policy and cost recovery mechanisms that could support development offshore.
The agency is also proceeding separately with a comprehensive study of the potential economic and environmental effects of developing offshore wind. The outcome of this study will help to define the nature of the supports needed for projects to advance.
Once understood, the state can then begin to evaluate which successful policy and regulatory mechanism may facilitate development, the plan states. These could include possible targeted renewable portfolio standard support, as well as new financing models or supply purchase options as circumstances may warrant.
The plan notes that two previous attempts to jump-start the sector did not lead to projects being developed largely due to the high cost of development compared to other alternatives.
It says the long Island Power Authority's Jones Beach project was "very expensive and perceived to be intrusive for the shoreline. New York Power Authority's project targeted at the Great Lakes suffered from "inadequate site and resource information along with premature issuances of a competitive solicitation" to developers, it adds.
The plan notes that neither of those projects had a plan for recovering the substantial above-market price subsidy required to develop offshore wind.
At present, private developer Deepwater Wind has proposed two utility-scale projects in federal waters off long Island. NYPA and other partners have put forward a 350MW project off the Rockaways in Queens.
The plan also lists other actions designed to meet its proposed capacity addition:
*Invest $1bn for 1000 MW of new electric transmission capacity
*Initiate $250m in new renewable energy projects, leveraging $425m in private investment and creating 270MW of new power
*Modernize and repower existing inefficient, high Emission plants to create 750MW of power, enabled by approximately $1.5bn investment.
*Generate 1,200GW of additional capacity through approximately $1bn investment to help meet reliability needs to address retiring power plants across the state.
*Accelerate $1.3bn of investment in existing transmission and distribution projects to enhance reliability, improve safety, reduce cost to customers and reduce emissions.
*Invest $250m to develop Smart Grid technologies and create the most advanced energy management control center in the country. END
Richard A. Kessler
Published: Wednesday, October 31 2012 -
Her står vel at der komme aftaler mellem Vestas og Vietnam i november.
Der skrives om en aftale mellem Cong Ly og Vestas, men mig bekendt så er det GE der har aftaler med dem.?
-
Korrekt 600mia USD.
Tilskud til fossile brændsler er 10 gange højere end til til vindenergi. -
Bare sådan for at ingen glemmer Tallene.
Vestas Værdi på på børsen er mindre end et års omsætning i deres service afdeling.
-
Nå nu har de nok snakket i TLF med MHI igen.Mon de holder telefonen for det døve øre.eller var de stillet forkert om sidst.
http://www.business.dk/investor/nordea-chancer-for-mitsubishi-aftale-falmer
-
det giver ikke megen mening for de skøre amerikanere atr bygge offshore som er op mod dobbelt så dyrt som onshore. Det er jo ikke lige frem plads de mangler onshore.....
-
Det kan vel ikke være fordi ikke vil røbe kunderne, de skal jo bare oplyse et antal solgte MW.
Jeg mener bare, at hvis det er vigtigt at oplyse om en kinesisk ordre på 49MW, så er det vel også vigtigt at oplyse om småordrene på f.esk. 354MW og 241MW, så snart man kende tallet. Det har trods alt betydning for vurderingen af ordreindgangen.
Som jeg ser det, har Vestas ingen grund til at holde på tallet, medmindre de justerer tallet på tværs af kvartalerne, men det tror jeg ikke på.
Nu har vi godt nok lige hørt lidt til forhandlingerne vedr. MHI, men har Vestas oplysningspligt hvis forhandlingerne bryder sammen? De har naturligvis ingen oplysningspligt når forhandlingerne pågår, men når oplysningerne nu engang er sluppet ud og Vestas måtte bekræfte rygterne, har de så pligt til at meddele et evt. sammebrud?
Vi kunne jo i teorien gå og vente på et resultat som ikke kommer, hvor Vestas har valgt ikke og informere ud.Hvor er grænsen for "vigtigt"?
-
Ja det kunne faktisk være en god ide om de oplyste antal solgte uannoncerede ordre f.eks en uge efter udløb af et Q. Det burde vitterligt ikke være noget problem.
MHI er ikke de eneste vestas forhandler med ang offshore. Så derfor mener jeg ikke de skal fortælle noget hvis MHI falder fra. Den eneste årsag til vestas har bekræftet mhi forbindelsen er at en journalist havde fået nys om den, og skrev en stor artikel om sagen
-
Jeg ved godt, at det er den eneste årsag og at vi ikke skulle have kendskab til forhandlingerne, men når nu rygtet er ude, må det vel betragtes som en væsentlig oplysning, hvis MHI falder fra?
Jeg er sikker på, at et frafald vil have væsentlig kurspåvirkning, lige som et tilvalg vil have det. -
nej jeg mener ikke det giver nogen mening at melde ud før de ved om de får en aftale eller ej med MHI eller en anden part
-
De har selv sagt de har modtaget flere henvendelser. Hvor aktive disse er ved vi så ikke noget om
-
Så kommer Syd Afrika også på vindenergikortet.
Artikel:
South Africa ready to sign deals with first renewables projects
South Africa has finally given the green light to an initial $5.4bn worth of renewable energy projects that will allow it to procure 1.4GW of electricity and help reduce its reliance on coal-fired plants, says the country's energy minister.
RELATED STORIES
South African ministers face flack over renewables 'debacle'
South Africa mulls 1GW annual renewables rounds in future
In Depth: Can South Africa win the trust of developers?
After months of delays, the Department of Energy says contracts will be signed on 5 and 6 November for the 28 wind and solar projects selected almost a year ago in the first round of South Africa's renewables programme.
The plants are due to be operational between 2014 and 2016.
Africa's largest economy depends on coal for 85% of its current power base of around 41GW.
South Africa has been struggling to meet a fast-rising demand for power. Bidding for alternative energy projects should add an additional 3.2GW to the national grid by 2020.
The South African Wind Energy Association (SAWEA) welcomed the government's announcements on the timing to finalise the country's first renewables projects, and of additional power allocations to the renewable energy programme.
"The SAWEA is relieved to hear that the government has announced its financial close dates and its protocol," says SAWEA chairperson Jasandra Nyker. "This signals an important step in the history of the development of the renewable energy sector.
"Even with the delays, financial close within 12 months for 28 projects is a very impressive achievement and the government should be applauded for its commitment to the programme," adds Nyker.
Christopher Hopson, London
Published: Wednesday, October 31 2012 -
Der står ikke 60 mia USD til vindindustri men 60 mia USD til clean energy tech i det hele taget, og heraf ca. halvdelen til renewable electricity technology som også indbefatter solceller mv. Så hvis vinden får alle subsidierne kan de komme op på 30 mia USD, men tallet er nok noget lavere.
"The growth of wind power is taking place against the backdrop of a highly publicised and often politicised debate about support for clean energy technologies in the absence of an effective price on carbon, air pollution, water pollution or fresh water consumption - these total about 60 billion USD per year globally, about half of which goes to renewable electricity technologies. In comparison, politicians seem reticent to scale back on the 600 billion USD subsidies (according to the International Energy Agency) that are expected to go to fossil fuels in 2012."
-
Korrekt. Tak for det.
Jeg konkluderer så at fossile brændsler modtager tilskud der er 20 gange større en den der tildeles renewable electricity technology .
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind