Skip to content
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto
  • Kategorier
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
  1. Debatforum
  2. Kategorier
  3. Genmab
  4. Genmab — Marts 2025

Genmab — Marts 2025

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
961 Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E_L
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #854

    Store fremskridt i behandling af knoglemarvskræft https://www.myelomatose.dk/nyheder/store-fremskridt-i-behandling-af-knoglemarvskraeft/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      E_L
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #855

      Bolt Biotherapeutics Reports Full-Year 2024 Financial Results https://investors.boltbio.com/news-releases/news-release-details/bolt-biotherapeutics-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024 - The Company continues to work with Genmab to discover and develop next-generation ISACs for the treatment of cancer. Genmab and the Company are working together to advance the collaboration’s first development candidate, and the collaboration also continues research and development on additional programs.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        E_L
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #856

        Bolt Presentation
        https://investors.boltbio.com/static-files/397f2c02-b515-44a2-a108-6e1302a91a98

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          E_L
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #857

          AbbVie and Genmab: Can a legal battle break a billion-dollar bond? https://www.labiotech.eu/trends-news/abbvie-genmab-lawsuit/

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • SEACOPS Offline
            SEACOPS Offline
            SEACOP
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #858

            Lahn 22:36: Dommerens afvisning 7½ mdr. (15.12.2023 - 29:07.2024).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #859

              Novartis to present new data at AAN, including seven-year disability outcomes and safety analysis of Kesimpta® in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis
              Mar 25, 2025 https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/novartis-present-new-data-aan-including-seven-year-disability-outcomes-and-safety-analysis-kesimpta-people-relapsing-multiple-sclerosis

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                E_L
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #860

                Rina-S Elicited Responses With/Without FRα Expression in Ovarian Cancer https://www.cancernetwork.com/view/rina-s-elicited-responses-with-without-fr-expression-in-ovarian-cancer

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                  Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                  Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #861

                  E L, thank you very much for the link10.08. The article provides relevant perspective on AbbVie's lawsuit against Genmab.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    lahn1
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #862

                    Does it worry you too, that Gmab is not arguing they come up with idea of using disaccharides to enhance the hydrophilicity. Rather they claim, "according to Genmab, AbbVie has never pursued the development of products using the alleged trade secrets — nor sought to protect them through patents. In Genmab’s view, this raises questions about whether AbbVie is now trying to assert control over innovations it neither commercialized nor legally secured.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      lahn1
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #863

                      Almost like, maybe we stole your idea, but you never secured it through patent.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        lahn1
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #864

                        Jeg havde helst set at de argumenterede at de selv var kommet op med ideen frem for dette.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          E_L
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #865

                          yes Helge, it will always be difficult to judge a relationship from the outside, we'll probably never really know what exactly is at play. https://pharmaphorum.com/news/abbvie-sues-genmab-claiming-trade-secrets-theft

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Offline
                            B Offline
                            BioShare
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #866

                            Helt enig lahn1, virker ikke gennemtænkt

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E Offline
                              E Offline
                              E_L
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #867

                              I think it is safe to assume they carefully worded their reply lahn , assume it was drafted by lawyers... if it is not something that needs protection (in a business where everything needs protecting) than maybe you don't think it is
                              very valuable...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Offline
                                E Offline
                                E_L
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #868

                                I also had to think about the remark from Jan at the time of the AbbVie deal, when he spoke about 'AbbVie's next generation ADC technology'. So I assume at that time they studied AbbVie's technology, but were not impressed enough for it to lead to anything. (and why did Genmab only notice that special part of the ADC technology when Profound showed it, and not AbbVie?? Was it even shown?)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #869

                                  Remember from that deal 'The discovery research collaboration will combine proprietary antibodies from both companies along with Genmab's DuoBody technology and AbbVie's payload and ADC technology to select and develop up to four additional differentiated next-generation antibody-based product candidates'.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    E_L
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #870

                                    It had already been a question mark for me why there were was nothing coming out of this. I had assumed the 50/50 split could be a potential hurdle for AbbVie to develop with Genmab what they could potentially do cheaper with a royalty deal or themselves. But it doesn't immediately show a deep and strong partner relationship if nothing comes out of it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      E_L
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #871

                                      At the same time, these are 2 professional parties that should be able to put revenues first and therefore I am not that worried about Epcoritamab, not for current indications, nor for potential future plans for autoimmune diseases. But for now I am assuming the other part of the original deal is dead for now (I already sort of was assuming that...). Just like I don't expect any partnerships with JNJ anymore.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        gentogen
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #872

                                        Regarding 12:24 the problem is that the wording is a wrong interpretation of what Genmab is saying. According to Genmab there was no trade secret in the first place (they call it an alleged trade secret several times) so they are not assuming that Abbvie had any innovation at all

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                          Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                          Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #873

                                          Genmab trækkes ind i retssag om tyveri af forretningshemmelighed af amerikansk gigant https://proinvestor.com/investornyt/1295173/genmab-traekkes-ind-i-retssag-om-tyveri-af-forretningshemmelighed-af-amerikansk-gigant

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Kategorier
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper