Aktiesnakken — December 2021
-
@Mcjean: Tak for din info. At POC skulle være totalt ligegyldig for os (hovedløse) auktionærer er jeg ikke enig.
Som medejer af firmaet vil jeg da vide om teknologien virker og opdateres på signifikante frem og tilbage skridt,
specielt når det er essentielt for fremtidige investerings beslutninger (FID) og i sidste ende min pengepung. -
@Reserven: Tak for info. Hvor mon det med de 2 linjer kommer fra? - jeg skal nok finde det
-
Screenshot af artiklen om QF (og PoC) i norske FA 01.07.2021: https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/proinvestor-dev/forum/boards/99459_FA_01.07.2021.png
-
Så det betyder ikke noget for dig, hvornår de får "skidtet" til at køre?
-
2022, 2025 ....
-
-
ret sikker på strudsen er KB, men jeg giver op med at finde kilden, da det nok kræver at gense tidligere webcasts.
-
Vi må jo bare vente og se hvad der sker til Januar.
-
"So we are now there that we are working on 2 lines, we have, as a relatively short-term goal, to get to what we consider proof for concept to get the whole system on online and working." https://finance.yahoo.com/news/edited-transcript-qfuel-ol-earnings-090000017.html
-
@DT_DK: Skulle du ikke have haft dette her med? "Operating parameters for us is time, it's pressure and it's heat. And when we have the stability and the time to optimize on these operating parameters, we can also then increase product quality. So -- and this is what we actually will consider proof of concept. What are we really doing in Skive, we are really looking at how the entire system of Quantafuel is working. The unique part of Quantafuel. We have a system to upgrade and so to remove
" -
-
@AH2005 Jeg tog blot det stykke med 2 linjer og POC, da det var det jeg ledte efter kilden til, men jo det er en lidt rodet transcript. Måske KB kørte med forskellige POC's
-
@Daytrader_DK, fra din Yahoo link (Q1 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript) https://finance.yahoo.com/news/edited-transcript-qfuel-ol-earnings-090000017.html :<br>
• «And when we have done that at a stable level, on 1 line, that is what we consider proof of concept.»<br> -
• «So we are now there that we are working on 2 lines, we have, as a relatively short-term goal, to get to what we consider proof for concept to get the whole system on online and working.»<br>
«... on online and working.» skal nok være «... on 1 line and working.»
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Tilmeld Log ind