Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Maj 2021

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.2k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
    Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #994

    Tak Gentogen. Det er en ordenlig smøre at komme igennem. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      kkjoel
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #995

      Det erindres osse at Jan himselv segade fornylig (tror det var cc efter 2021Q1 at Geville få højere royalties NETOP pga. Gen havde skabt BEGGE de to indgående antistoffer, der er linket sammen. Han gentofg

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        kkjoel
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #996

        Den tager vi lige igen.. 😉

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          kkjoel
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #997

          Det erindres osse at Jan himself fornylig sagde (tror det var cc 2021Q1), at GEN ville få højere royalties (low double-digits, som jeg husker det) NETOP pga. at GEN havde skabt BEGGE de indgående antistoffer (der derefter er linket sammen). Han gentog ovenikøbet pointen og lød meget stolt over det!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Offline
            K Offline
            kkjoel
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #998

            Så deeeet..... JnJs version udelader ÅBENLYST en uomgængelig og vigtig del af sandheden (men som altid vil man kunne fastholde at man ikke har løjet..) (festligt hvor barnligt og umodent såkaldt ANSVARLIGE firmaer kan optræder når det kommer til at fremstå innovativt og udviklingsfokuseret...)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              kkjoel
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #999

              Yup - det var Peter Welford, Jefferies, der spurgte: " I think, Jan said it was royalties of high single to low double. Is that an equivalent per term or so for the -- all of the J&J Duo bodies? Or does it -- does the royalty rate potentially vary by DuoBody?"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                kkjoel
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #1000

                Jan: "Then on amivantamab the royalty rate is different for the different DuoBody molecules. But you may remember Peter is that we have two different sets of agreements with Janssen. And I think 2012 and then and then in 2013 for a broader and broader set of DuoBody candidates for projects for Janssen. And the actually amivantamab is the one where we get the highest loyalty Peter from all the DuoBody molecules."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kkjoel
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #1001

                  "And the reason is that Genmab not only allowed access to the DuoBody technology platform by Janssen and to create panels of bispecifics. We also created -- physically created the eGFR arm and the CNET arm the panels with Janssen then used to build amivantamab from."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kkjoel
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #1002

                    Access to this page has been denied

                    px-captcha

                    favicon

                    (seekingalpha.com)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Offline
                      K Offline
                      kkjoel
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #1003

                      Nej, det har intet med voldgift og grumset at gøre. Det er bare JNJ der udlægger virkeligheden anderledes END virkeligheden 😉 Men de er ikke uenige om royalties såvidt vides. Ikke endnu ihvertfald. Så man skal nok ikke puste til bjørnen før den skindet skindet og rejser sig og truer...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Offline
                        K Offline
                        kkjoel
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #1004

                        ..før den smider skindet...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K Offline
                          K Offline
                          kkjoel
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #1005

                          😉

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K Offline
                            K Offline
                            kkjoel
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #1006

                            Og tegn på dårligt samarbejde. Slet ikke. Bare et stort firma der på barnligste, kommercielle, vis fremhæver sig selv og underspiller andres vigtige fødder i scoringen. Lidt lissom' blærerøven i skolegården, der mente han alene lavede alle målene.. eller folk på de fleste direktørgange, som tildeler sig selv langt de største dele af overskudskagerne og skider på at HELE firmaet har været med!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K Offline
                              K Offline
                              kkjoel
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #1007

                              Måskeeeee... men det er man jo ikke. Så derfor: no sweat. 😉

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • K Offline
                                K Offline
                                kkjoel
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #1008

                                Var det Bulder, der spurgte til suffixet i amivantamab: amivantamab-vmjw? Det er en tilfældig samling af bogstaver, som IKKE må have nogen mening og hvis funktion er at kunne skelne et biosimilært kopi-produkt fra det originale produkt. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/alphabet-soup-the-story-behind-biosimilar-nonproprietary-name-suffixes

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K Offline
                                  K Offline
                                  kkjoel
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #1009

                                  Og her FDAs skriv "Nonproprietary Naming Guidance", på s.10 står om suffixet. https://www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Nonproprietary-Naming-of-Biological-Products-Guidance-for-Industry.pdf

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • K Offline
                                    K Offline
                                    kkjoel
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #1010

                                    Fra FDA-dok: Det SKAL "•Be unique•Be devoid of meaning •Be four lowercase letters of which at least three are distinct •Be nonproprietary•Be attached to the core name with a hyphen•Be free of legal barriers that would restrict its usage"

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K Offline
                                      K Offline
                                      kkjoel
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #1011

                                      Og det MÅ IKKE: "•Be false or misleading, such as by making misrepresentations with respect to safety or efficacy•Include numerals and other symbols aside from the hyphen attaching the suffix to the core name•Include abbreviations commonly used in clinical practice in a manner that may lead the suffix to be misinterpreted as another element on the prescription or order•Contain or suggest any drug substance name or core name..

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • K Offline
                                        K Offline
                                        kkjoel
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #1012

                                        •Look similar to or be capable of being mistaken for the name of a currently marketed product (e.g., should not increase the risk of confusion or medical errors with the product and/or other products in the clinical setting)•Look similar to or otherwise connote the name of the license holder•Be too similar to any other FDA-designated nonproprietary name suffix"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Sukkeralf
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #1013

                                          Godt fundet kkjoel

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger