Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — September 2019

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
2.4k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kkjoel
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #741

    This new strategic collaboration builds upon existing service agreements between the companies. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, the companies will jointly work on research projects that are identified by Genmab to explore novel product concepts and biomarkers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      kkjoel
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #742

      For any resulting products, Genmab will lead all development and commercial activities. Tempus will be eligible for undisclosed milestones and royalties from Genmab and will also have the option to fund part of product development programs in exchange for increased royalty payments due to Tempus under the agreement.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        kkjoel
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #743

        “Tempus has built the world’s largest library of clinical and molecular data, is a leader in the field of personalized medicine and like Genmab, Tempus has a mission to improve the lives of cancer patients. We are looking forward to expanding our exciting partnership with them and to the possibility of discovering important new oncology targets and biomarkers,” said Jan van de Winkel, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Genmab.

        Today’s news does not impact Genmab’s 2019 Financial Guidance.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          kkjoel
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #744

          Ja, det er jo nok ikke denneher emissionsprovenuet skulle benyttes til..
          😉

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            Bella1
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #745

            Markedet er tilsyneladende ligeglade....

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              kkjoel
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #746

              Fedt!!.. med Priority Review på Tepro 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                kkjoel
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #747

                Tempus' hjemmeside: https://www.tempus.com/

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kkjoel
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #748

                  Og et lille skriv om firmaet fra maj i år: https://medcitynews.com/2019/05/chicago-precision-medicine-startup-tempus/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kkjoel
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #749

                    En anden artikel om dem: https://www.businessinsider.com/tempus-closed-200-million-funding-round-reaching-3-billion-valuation-2019-5?r=US&IR=T

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Offline
                      K Offline
                      kkjoel
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #750

                      Og en nyhed udsendt i juni, hvor der snakkes rundtom hvervning af patienter til kliniske studier og om hvordan Tempus' kan hjælpe i den henseende: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/06/03/1863365/0/en/Tempus-Announces-TIME-Trial-Service-a-New-Integrated-Molecular-Evaluation-that-Leverages-Artificial-Intelligence-to-Rapidly-Match-Cancer-Patients-to-Clinical-Trials.html

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Offline
                        K Offline
                        kkjoel
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #751

                        Måske rigtigt nyttigt for GEN ifm. hvervning af patienter til de fremtidige studier af egne nye antistof-kandidater....

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K Offline
                          K Offline
                          kkjoel
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #752

                          Sådan noget der bringer på forkant i stedet for til bagsmæk 😉

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • V Offline
                            V Offline
                            Vitus
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #753

                            Omverdenen har åbenbart svært ved at se noget positivt i det....tænker måske samtidig på hvorfor Genmab opbygger en kæmpeorganisation ......

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • StockBullS Offline
                              StockBullS Offline
                              StockBull
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #754

                              Meget normalt med lidt gevinsthjemtagning ovenpå god stigning.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • V Offline
                                V Offline
                                Vitus
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #755

                                Ja, er så allerede faldet “en hund” tilbage igen -:(

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #756

                                  it is a broadly negative day for healthcare and biotech

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    E_L
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #757

                                    another JNJ duobody doubling anticipated recruitment (CD3 GPRC5D from 87 to 185 ) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT03399799?A=13&B=14&C=merged#StudyPageTop

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • SolsenS Offline
                                      SolsenS Offline
                                      Solsen
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #758

                                      Angående de 26 pts, der indgik i Enapotamab forsøget så skulle 4 pts være døde kort tid efter inclusion i forsøget og det skulle ikke være Enapotamab, der var årsag. Dernæst har 2 stk forladt forsøget af andre grunde. Det bringer klarhed om de 6 pts der var grupperet i “NE” og som indgår i procentberegningen.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BulderB Offline
                                        BulderB Offline
                                        Bulder
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #759

                                        Tak solsen

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • SolsenS Offline
                                          SolsenS Offline
                                          Solsen
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #760

                                          Kigger man på kurverne så kunne 3 pts meget vel nå eller er meget tæt på at nå de 30% så næste tal kunne i princippet godt ramme mellem 20-40% i ORR. Men duration er også vigtig samt hvis man kunne identificere en biomarkør.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger