Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Juni 2019

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
2.2k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sukkeralf
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #625

    If I remember correctly Jans first thoughts of new INDs for 2019 was 3-5 and recently it was 3 (and we know them all) but maybe HexaCD38 could have been close so I hope it will be a 2020 IND

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      lahn1
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #626

      @09:28 yes I see that now. It stille feels early to do this deal, hence the "pure milestone
      payement"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Sukkeralf
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #627

        But the deal need to be in place for Genmab to do the costly preclinical work

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          lahn1
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #628

          yes nice to have a buyer on hand, maybe not as bad a deal as it seemed at first glance

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nohopeN Offline
            nohopeN Offline
            nohope
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #629

            I´ll welcome almost any kind of deals, also, this deal, but it does seem rather far away from what Jan has been talking about. This is a techdeal with a product, this should have been paid upfront and/or on 50/50 basis. But any hole in the no-deal-wall is welcome to me.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #630

              I am actually very excited about this deal- Dara is the backbone of this company and Genmab is looking to strengthen and extend that backbone. Extremely important and a sign of mature management with a long term view imo. I really like Sukkeralf's term 'life cycle management' in this respect.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                E_L
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #631

                @nohope 09:21 is my answer to that.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nohopeN Offline
                  nohopeN Offline
                  nohope
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #632

                  Well, you could also say, this emphasasi that GEN is a one-trick pony - Darapony.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Offline
                    E Offline
                    E_L
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #633

                    even if that would be right; i would rather have a strong pony that lives longer 😉

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nohopeN Offline
                      nohopeN Offline
                      nohope
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #634

                      Ok, I see. Too bad, but still better than the Theresa May scenario 😉

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nohopeN Offline
                        nohopeN Offline
                        nohope
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #635

                        Ponies forever 😉

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • SolsenS Offline
                          SolsenS Offline
                          Solsen
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #636

                          To me the agreement is still like Genmab asking Janssens for a deal - not a move from Janssens.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • SolsenS Offline
                            SolsenS Offline
                            Solsen
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #637

                            Perhaps its foresight ?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Sukkeralf
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #638

                              when sc dosing of CD38 it should be secured until 2033-35...........a with all the alternatives Janssen is doing right now I agree with Solsen that Genmab has pushed this foreward and Janssen at last agree to "show us what it can do"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Sukkeralf
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #639

                                But a nice deal to get in place before a DR5/DR5 deal and to get HexaBody and perhaps HexElect in the spotlight

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • troldmandenT Offline
                                  troldmandenT Offline
                                  troldmanden
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #640

                                  mindes ikke lige at have set en sådan struktureret deal før. Uden noget i upfront

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • troldmandenT Offline
                                    troldmandenT Offline
                                    troldmanden
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #641

                                    POC kan være defineret lidt forskelligt. Men cost bør ikke opverstige 200 mio, og det over de næste 3-4 år. Så det beløb betyder i sig selv ikke noget for genmab. De har også sagt det ikke ændre på forventningerne

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • troldmandenT Offline
                                      troldmandenT Offline
                                      troldmanden
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #642

                                      det er gratis for jansen at lave denne aftale, og de sikre sig endda at Genmab ikke må sætte den op som direkte konkurrent til dara, såfremt jannsen skulle undlade at udnytte optionen

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • troldmandenT Offline
                                        troldmandenT Offline
                                        troldmanden
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #643

                                        Should Janssen not exercise its option, the terms of the agreement allow Genmab to continue to develop and commercialize HexaBody-CD38 for DARZALEX-resistant patients, and in all other indications except those multiple myeloma or amyloidosis indications where DARZALEX is either approved or is being actively developed.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          gentogen
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #644

                                          Ja, men det er vel en OK pointe, at de i givet fald gerne må i Dara-resistente. Det er svært at forestille sig JNJ ikke slå til, hvis det er bedre end Dara...

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger