Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Januar 2019

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
2.8k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E_L
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #962

    @Bulder if you are interested in Melflufen , i read this presentation earlier https://www.oncopeptides.se/en/2019-j-p-morgan-health-care-conference-presentation/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      E_L
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #963

      @kkjoel i imagine @Sukkeralf posted that link for the news on ADCT-601 , which they develop alone if i am correct

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        E_L
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #964

        based 301 data at ASH18 they plan a PhII trial in 2019

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          kkjoel
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #965

          Yes, you're probably right. But GEN only has part in ADCT-301, so that's why I focused that direction..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Offline
            K Offline
            kkjoel
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #966

            Have you got any thoughts on response rates on a late 6. line? (It was probably discussed here after ASH.) And any insights into correlation between possibility for "deep" response and how far down treament-regime one is? (maybe also that was discussed here after ASH..)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              kkjoel
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #967

              Ahhhh, ADCT-601 binder til AXL.. så osse derfor specifkt interessant i GEN regi (enapotamab vedotin)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                kkjoel
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #968

                Så eftersom begge stoffer binder til AXL, ligner det derfor spørgsmålet om det er ADCTs eller GENs cellegift der er den bedste/kan fåes til at virke bedst?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kkjoel
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #969

                  Hvor ADCT har deres egen gift, mens GENs kommer fra Seatlle Genetics.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Offline
                    D Offline
                    dohk
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #970

                    Linker teknologien er rigtig vigtig. Linkeren kløves når ADCen transporteres ind i cellen og giften frigives. Der har været problemer med bivirkninger fordi linkeren kløves for tidligt...husker i hvert fald at immunogen havde problemer. SGEN har masser af validering af deres teknologi, så nok derfor Genmab kigger mod dem.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Offline
                      D Offline
                      dohk
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #971

                      Kan ikke huske hvilken linker teknologi ADC technology bruger og hvilken grad af validering den har.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        E_L
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #972

                        Perseus (D-VRd SC) recruiting. Wonder how many of us will still be around here at the end of this trial... 😉 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT03710603?A=1&B=2&C=merged

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          E_L
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #973

                          @kkjoel it is still early days for 301... we'll have to wait for a bit more data me thinks

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BulderB Offline
                            BulderB Offline
                            Bulder
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #974

                            @ E L: I think they'll ask for approval of D-VRd asct based on Griffin, when we get the full data set (and data is good enough). Perseus is just to confirm data, and FDA will probably only give an approval on the condition that they make a large phase 3.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E Offline
                              E Offline
                              E_L
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #975

                              sounds good to me...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Offline
                                B Offline
                                bibob
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #976

                                Hold da op.!!- shorterne har fået presset Oddset på dansk sejr over Norge ned til 1,58 . 😄

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  Peter_Panik
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #977

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Siden findes ikke

                                  favicon

                                  (borsen.dk)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    peter12
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #978

                                    Og det var så noget der skete i oktober. Børsen har vist ikke læst hvad der står ...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktørH Offline
                                      Helge_LarsenPI-redaktør
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #979

                                      Genmab Shareholders: Register your email to receive electronic shareholder communications from Genmab incl. the calling to Genmab’s Annual General Meetings. Log on to the InvestorPortal & add your email under “My Profile”. The portal can be accessed from http://www.genmab.com .

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Peter_Panik
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #980

                                        Jo, de er hurtige på Børsen. Nyheden tjekkede lige ind som Breaking News på min telefon også. Absurd!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • SolsenS Offline
                                          SolsenS Offline
                                          Solsen
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #981

                                          Finansielle instrumenter med stemmeret ?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger