Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Oktober 2018

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
4.4k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    E_L
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #644

    Poster Display session

     

    963P - A phase IIa study of tisotumab vedotin in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Updated analysis of full cervical expansion cohort

    Presentation Number

    963P

    Lecture Time

    12:30 - 12:30

    Speakers

    Nicole Concin (Parsippany, US)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Offline
      E Offline
      E_L
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #645

      Background

      Treatment options for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer are limited, with no standard of care beyond 1L treatment and 2L response rates of ∼13%. Tisotumab vedotin (TV) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a fully human monoclonal antibody specific for tissue factor (TF) conjugated to the microtubule disrupting-agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a protease cleavable linker. TV is being evaluated in GEN701 (innovaTV 201), a Phase I/IIa dose-escalation and expansion

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        E_L
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #646

        study in patients (pts) with previously treated recurrent locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours. A previous report of the preliminary expansion cohort for cervical cancer (n = 34) showed an investigator (INV)-assessed response rate of 32% (26% confirmed) (Vergote et al., ESMO 2017 abstract #931O). INV response for the full cervical expansion cohort (N = 55) and response by independent imaging review (IIR) (n = 34) are presented here.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          E_L
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #647

          Methods

          Key eligibility criteria included recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer that progressed on standard therapy, adequate organ function and ECOG 0-1. TV 2 mg/kg Q3W was given until progression, toxicity or withdrawal. Activity and safety were assessed by RECIST 1.1 and CTCAE 4.03, respectively. Enrollment started in November 2015 and continued through May 2018.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            E_L
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #648

            Results

            The full cohort has 55 pts (median age was 47 y [21-74]). Updated efficacy by INV review, safety data, and response by TF expression will be presented. Median age in the first 34 pts was 44 y (21-74) and pts received a median of 2 prior lines for recurrent or metastatic disease. ORR by IIR of 41% (95% CI: 25%-59%), including 1 CR and 13 PR. 8 (1 CR, 7 PRs) were confirmed (24%; 95% CI: 11%-41%). Confirmed response rate was concordant between INV and IIR (26% and 24%). Median duration of

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #649

              response was 4.9 months and median PFS was 4.2 months by IIR.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                E_L
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #650

                Conclusions

                These data demonstrate that TV has encouraging activity in previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, an underserved population with a high unmet need, and that responses observed with TV are numerically higher than those achieved by historical controls. These data support the continued investigation of TV in this population.

                Clinical trial identification

                NCT02001623.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Offline
                  E Offline
                  E_L
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #651

                  (End)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • BulderB Offline
                    BulderB Offline
                    Bulder
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #652

                    Tak E L.
                    41% ORR heraf 1 CR - er det godt?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • BulderB Offline
                      BulderB Offline
                      Bulder
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #653

                      Tyder på bedre responsrate end i rapporten fra sidste år (32%)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • DarvinD Offline
                        DarvinD Offline
                        Darvin
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #654

                        Thanks E L - lidt forvirret. ORR er højere end sidst men median ser ud til at være kortere.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                          JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                          JørgenVarnæs
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #655

                          Kom N=34 resultaterne ikke fra dose eskaleringen_

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BulderB Offline
                            BulderB Offline
                            Bulder
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #656

                            Hvad var responsvarigheden sidst?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E Offline
                              E Offline
                              E_L
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #657

                              So, standard of care beyond 1L treatment and 2L response rates of ∼13%

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Offline
                                E Offline
                                E_L
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #658

                                Last year n=34, investigator assessed ORR 32% (26% confirmed) median age 44

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Offline
                                  E Offline
                                  E_L
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #659

                                  Now n=55, investigator assessed ORR 41% (24% confirmed) median age 47

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • BulderB Offline
                                    BulderB Offline
                                    Bulder
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #660

                                    Do you happen to know the duration of response last year?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • BulderB Offline
                                      BulderB Offline
                                      Bulder
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #661

                                      Nevertheless, 41% is far better than 13%

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BulderB Offline
                                        BulderB Offline
                                        Bulder
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #662

                                        The 41% ORR was found by IIR (independent imaging review ) and not INV as far as I can see.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          E_L
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #663

                                          found last year https://oncologypro.esmo.org/Meeting-Resources/ESMO-2017-Congress/A-Phase-IIa-Study-of-Tisotumab-Vedotin-HuMax-R-TF-ADC-in-Patients-With-Relapsed-Recurrent-and-or-Metastatic-Cervical-Cancer

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger