<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Mange analytikere skriver, at kursfaldet er en overreaktion.<br />
Det er det helt sikkert.</p>
<p dir="auto">Men Novo er selv ude om det voldsomme fald i dag.</p>
<ul>
<li>Deres kommunikation om hvad der kunne forventes af CagriSema studiet har været for upræcis i længere tid.</li>
<li>Når deltagerne i et studie selv kan justere deres dosis ned - ja så er det lidt svært at tage resultaterne alvorligt.</li>
<li>Og med en gns. vægt af deltagerne på ca 106 kg er det jo ikke svært overvægtige der har deltaget.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Det var umiddelbart de punkter jeg hæftede mig ved. Men der er sikkert flere.</p>
<p dir="auto">Det skulle ikke undre mig, at Novo - igen - bliver sagsøgt af sure amerikanske investorer for ikke at have oplyst markedet 'godt' nok.<br />
Og det kan jeg faktisk godt forstå.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/topic/446923/novo-reaktioner-p-cagrisema-studiet</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 22:21:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/topic/446923.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:56:18 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:00:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Måske Novo's design i virkeligheden er det mest troværdige, fordi at folk faktisk selv bestemte!<br />
Det viser jo, hvordan folk vil agere når de selv bestemmer og dermed giver det et realistisk billede af hvad folk vil opleve.<br />
Det er selvfølgelig uheldigt, hvis fokus er på hvis der er størst, højest og smukkest - på papiret <img src="https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=de222e39001" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":-)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490955</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490955</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hansen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 06:00:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:07:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Der er enkelte dage på aktiemarkedet, som Helge Larsen aldrig glemmer. I går var en af dem. Novos aktiekurs tog et kæmpe dyk efter offentliggørelsen af ellers nydelige data på CagriSema. Men data levede ikke op til markedets forventninger. Helge Larsen tager et grundigt kig på, hvilke faktorer der har fået investorerne til at gå helt i panik, og hvordan fremtiden tegner for den danske fedmegigant.<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ORDnmy2mEE" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ORDnmy2mEE</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490952</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490952</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProinvestorNEWS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:07:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Sat, 21 Dec 2024 23:18:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Jeg er bestemt tilhænger af de tanker der kommer frem herinde. Men Kan det tænkes at Novo jo viste at bivirkningsprofilen er vigtig da vægtabet stort set er magen til, ville blive magen til Zepbound, og derfor gjorde doseringen frivillig så bivirkningerne ville blive mere moderate og discontinuation forhåbentlig mindre. Derfor er kun godt halvdelen nået op på max dosis og ikke fordi patienterne har nået en tilpas vægt.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490960</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lahn1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 23:18:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Sat, 21 Dec 2024 07:47:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">&quot;We are encouraged by the weight loss profile of CagriSema. This was achieved even though only 57% of patients reached the highest CagriSema dose,&quot; said Martin Holst Lange, executive vice president for development at Novo Nordisk, in a statement Friday&quot;.⁠</p>
<p dir="auto"><div class="card col-md-9 col-lg-6 position-relative link-preview p-0">



<a href="https://www.instagram.com/yahoofinance/p/DD0JbqpxxP6/" title="Yahoo Finance on Instagram: "Novo Nordisk (NVO) reported its newest GLP-1 product, CagriSema, provides an average of 22.7% weight loss, but that wasn't enough to convince investors, sparking a sell-off of the stock.⁠
⁠
"We are encouraged by the weight loss profile of CagriSema. This was achieved even though only 57% of patients reached the highest CagriSema dose,” said Martin Holst Lange, executive vice president for development at Novo Nordisk, in a statement Friday.⁠
⁠
The results came from a trial of nondiabetic adults with obesity. A second late-stage trial for diabetics is underway, with results expected in the first half of 2025.⁠
⁠
Novo traded down more than 20% Friday morning, its biggest loss since 2002. The CagriSema news boosted competitors, such as Eli Lilly (LLY), whose stock bumped up more than 6%.⁠
⁠
The results are significantly better than those of Novo's current GLP-1s, Ozempic for diabetes and Wegovy for weight loss, which provide around 15% weight loss. But Novo's management had been bullish on CagriSema, setting the bar at 25%.⁠
⁠
"This is below the Street’s expectation of 25% and more comparable to the ~21% for Zepbound. It appears the protocol for the CagriSema trial included flexible dosing, and this led to only ~57% of patients reaching the highest dose of the product/contributed to the lower-than-expected avg weight loss," JPMorgan analysts wrote in a note to clients Friday.⁠
⁠
Read further at the link in our bio."">
<img src="https://scontent-fra3-1.cdninstagram.com/v/t51.82787-15/624480297_17996099756907253_3007925699917881709_n.jpg?stp=c288.0.864.864a_dst-jpg_e35_s640x640_tt6&_nc_cat=101&ccb=7-5&_nc_sid=18de74&efg=eyJlZmdfdGFnIjoiRkVFRC5iZXN0X2ltYWdlX3VybGdlbi5DMyJ9&_nc_ohc=bjDD4eyQqbYQ7kNvwHgfLt_&_nc_oc=Adq74WRyXV5KYyRSux-Tt-_MjCrvM51jVKy3qVJpjy2AF0WjAi_W1xTXafkTbmWqeq8&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-fra3-1.cdninstagram.com&_nc_gid=kziOTo6cer4luz2BUhtZ6g&_nc_ss=7f689&oh=00_Af8sjne4uEz2xRGgJkpJlM3pSamTAe-bvwGlrS-fj7Wicw&oe=6A34EEAA" class="card-img-top not-responsive" style="max-height: 15rem;" alt="Link Preview Image" onerror="this.parentElement.remove()" />
</a>



<div class="card-body">
<h5 class="card-title">
<a class="text-decoration-none" href="https://www.instagram.com/yahoofinance/p/DD0JbqpxxP6/">
Yahoo Finance on Instagram: "Novo Nordisk (NVO) reported its newest GLP-1 product, CagriSema, provides an average of 22.7% weight loss, but that wasn't enough to convince investors, sparking a sell-off of the stock.⁠
⁠
"We are encouraged by the weight loss profile of CagriSema. This was achieved even though only 57% of patients reached the highest CagriSema dose,” said Martin Holst Lange, executive vice president for development at Novo Nordisk, in a statement Friday.⁠
⁠
The results came from a trial of nondiabetic adults with obesity. A second late-stage trial for diabetics is underway, with results expected in the first half of 2025.⁠
⁠
Novo traded down more than 20% Friday morning, its biggest loss since 2002. The CagriSema news boosted competitors, such as Eli Lilly (LLY), whose stock bumped up more than 6%.⁠
⁠
The results are significantly better than those of Novo's current GLP-1s, Ozempic for diabetes and Wegovy for weight loss, which provide around 15% weight loss. But Novo's management had been bullish on CagriSema, setting the bar at 25%.⁠
⁠
"This is below the Street’s expectation of 25% and more comparable to the ~21% for Zepbound. It appears the protocol for the CagriSema trial included flexible dosing, and this led to only ~57% of patients reaching the highest dose of the product/contributed to the lower-than-expected avg weight loss," JPMorgan analysts wrote in a note to clients Friday.⁠
⁠
Read further at the link in our bio."
</a>
</h5>
<p class="card-text line-clamp-3">2,119 likes, 19 comments - yahoofinance on December 20, 2024: "Novo Nordisk (NVO) reported its newest GLP-1 product, CagriSema, provides an average of 22.7% weight loss, but that wasn't enough to convince investors, sparking a sell-off of the stock.⁠
⁠
"We are encouraged by the weight loss profile of CagriSema. This was achieved even though only 57% of patients reached the highest CagriSema dose,” said Martin Holst Lange, executive vice president for development at Novo Nordisk, in a statement Friday.⁠
⁠
The results came from a trial of nondiabetic adults with obesity. A second late-stage trial for diabetics is underway, with results expected in the first half of 2025.⁠
⁠
Novo traded down more than 20% Friday morning, its biggest loss since 2002. The CagriSema news boosted competitors, such as Eli Lilly (LLY), whose stock bumped up more than 6%.⁠
⁠
The results are significantly better than those of Novo's current GLP-1s, Ozempic for diabetes and Wegovy for weight loss, which provide around 15% weight loss. But Novo's management had been bullish on CagriSema, setting the bar at 25%.⁠
⁠
"This is below the Street’s expectation of 25% and more comparable to the ~21% for Zepbound. It appears the protocol for the CagriSema trial included flexible dosing, and this led to only ~57% of patients reaching the highest dose of the product/contributed to the lower-than-expected avg weight loss," JPMorgan analysts wrote in a note to clients Friday.⁠
⁠
Read further at the link in our bio.". </p>
</div>
<a href="https://www.instagram.com/yahoofinance/p/DD0JbqpxxP6/" class="card-footer text-body-secondary small d-flex gap-2 align-items-center lh-2">



<img src="https://static.cdninstagram.com/rsrc.php/yr/r/rzWiSjZRxk5.webp" alt="favicon" class="not-responsive overflow-hiddden" style="max-width: 21px; max-height: 21px;" onerror="this.remove()"/>















<p class="d-inline-block text-truncate mb-0">Instagram <span class="text-secondary">(www.instagram.com)</span></p>
</a>
</div></p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490954</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490954</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Urban]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 07:47:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Sat, 21 Dec 2024 07:08:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Mener bare at hvis førnævnte er tilfældet. Har de så styr på deres forsøg? Ellers er jeg jo enig med dig.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490951</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490951</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[koden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 07:08:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:29:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hvad mener du med dette? Med tanke på Novos størrelse og historik, så er de da naturligvis kompetente.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490953</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490953</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Milito]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:29:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:15:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hvis dete r tilfældet så er det mere skørt. Men er Novo så prof. nok til at køre sådan nogle forsøg?</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490950</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490950</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[koden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:15:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 19:26:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Novo har tilsyneladende designet studiet, så folk selv kan bestemme hvornår et vægttab er nok, herunder dosis. Ud fra dette, er valide tal kun fra 57 procent af deltagerene. Hvis dette tal var 90 procent af deltagerne eller flere, ville CagriSema formentlig være langt over 25 procent i vægttab - snarer omkring de 30 procent. Det er designet helt skævt. Deltagerne er sprunget fra i takt med et tilfredsstillende vægttab!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490947</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490947</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vestasfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 19:26:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:07:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">For høje forventninger. Jeg synes nu det er markedet og analytikere før udmelding, som gør for meget ud af forskel mellem 23 og 27%.</p>
<p dir="auto">Da jeg i går læste om 20% op ved 27%, 10% ved 25% og 20% ned ved lavere end 25%, så synes jeg det lød skørt.</p>
<p dir="auto">Det skete så...men er stadig skørt.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490949</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490949</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[koden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:07:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:11:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Venter bare på at US advokater søger efter deltagere til et gruppesagsmål.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490946</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490946</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hyst]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:11:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:06:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hvis vægttabet er for voldsom er det vel en god ide nedsætte dosis.</p>
<p dir="auto">Det kunne være være interessant, hvis de forholdt sig sådan, hvis det er på grund af bivirkninger ville det ikke være godt.</p>
<p dir="auto">Kunne være interessant at se mellemresultater.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490945</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490945</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hyst]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:06:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:28:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ja, jeg kan slet ikke forstå at det kan være en videnskablig undersøgelse, hvis deltagerne selv kan bestemme doseringen?</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490944</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490944</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thunderbolt52]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:28:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Novo - reaktioner på CagriSema studiet. on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:11:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ja, Novo har skudt sig selv i foden ved at give markedet alt for høje forventninger.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490943</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9490943</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stockwatch1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:11:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>