<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Vestas vs Tesla]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Er der nogen der ved hvorfor Vestas lige nu er i gang med at danne en Tesla.<br />
Den er da røget urimelig højt, har solgt dem jeg havde tilbage. Hvad har i andre gjort?<br />
Håber/tror den skal runde 600 igen.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/topic/441587/vestas-vs-tesla</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 04:35:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/topic/441587.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:51:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Vestas vs Tesla on Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:16:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Esset  Hvem ved, men maaske havde det noget med forventningerne til og resultatet af EUCO-moedet at goere? Der blev afsat en hel del penge til den groenne omstilling. 30% af den del af puljen, hvis jeg husker rigtigt.</p>
<p dir="auto">Eller ogsaa proever jeg bare at rationalisere noget, der ikke kan rationaliseres.</p>
<p dir="auto">Ved stigende omsaetning fra service-kontrakter vil jeg gerne eje Vestas.</p>
<p dir="auto">Jeg ville ikke umiddelbart selv koebe den til den nuvaerende kurs, men jeg har delvis forstaaelse for dem, der ikke saelger den.</p>
<p dir="auto">EUCO-forstaaelses-dokumentet er forresten at finde nedenfor, og der er rigtig nok tale om 30%. SF (og Radikale og Konservative?) havde vist oensket minimum 25%, saa det maa siges at vaere nogenlunde godkendt paa det punkt, selv om European Greens og Enhedslisten er meget kritiske.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/07/21/european-council-conclusions-17-21-july-2020/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/07/21/european-council-conclusions-17-21-july-2020/</a><br />
"Climate action will be mainstreamed in policies and programmes financed under the MFF and<br />
NGEU. An overall climate target of 30% will apply to the total amount of expenditure from<br />
the MFF and NGEU and be reflected in appropriate targets in sectoral legislation. They shall<br />
comply with the objective of EU climate neutrality by 2050 and contribute to achieving the<br />
Union's new 2030 climate targets, which will be updated by the end of the year. As a general<br />
principle, all EU expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives."</p>
<p dir="auto">Member States with a gross national income ratio equal to or above 100% or more<br />
developed regions will allocate at least 85% of their total ERDF resources under<br />
priorities other than for technical assistance to "smart" and "green" objectives, and at<br />
least 30% to "green";<br />
Member States with a gross national income ratio equal to or above 75% and below<br />
100% or transition regions will allocate at least 40% of their total ERDF resources<br />
under priorities other than for technical assistance to "smart", and at least 30% to<br />
"green";<br />
Member States with a gross national income ratio below 75% or less developed regions<br />
will allocate at least 25% of their total ERDF resources under priorities other than for<br />
technical assistance to "smart", and at least 30% to "green".</p>
<p dir="auto">Funding in this Heading focuses on delivering added value through a modernised, sustainable<br />
agricultural, maritime and fisheries policy as well as by advancing climate action and<br />
promoting environmental and biodiversity protection. The mainstreaming of climate across<br />
the budget and enhanced integration of environmental objectives gives this Heading a key role<br />
in reaching the ambitious target of at least 30% of EU expenditure contributing to climate<br />
objectives</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/proinvestor-dev/forum/boards/85314_VWS.CO_evebitda_2011_01_01_2020_7.png" alt="85314_VWS.CO_evebitda_2011_01_01_2020_7.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9460423</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9460423</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tommycarstensen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:16:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Vestas vs Tesla on Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:38:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Jeg ser ikke noget galt i, at den sætter ny ATH den ene dag efter den anden. Blæs på det. Vedvarende energi er fremtiden.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9460422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9460422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bikube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:38:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>