<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Analyse af Columbus]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Analysen er lavet af Aktieinfo:</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.aktieinfo.net/filer/columbush12016.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.aktieinfo.net/filer/columbush12016.pdf</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/topic/439539/analyse-af-columbus</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:33:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/topic/439539.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 22:46:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Analyse af Columbus on Mon, 05 Sep 2016 04:09:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Også nævnt i seneste udgave af Aktionæren, hvor Thorleif Jackson, Gustav og Philip kiggede på undervurderede mid- og small cap-aktier. Columbus blev dog vurderet i den lidt dyre ende efter meget flotte kursstigninger.</p>
]]></description><link>https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9452051</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://dev.proinvestor.com/forum/post/9452051</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TeamGarlic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 04:09:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>