Skip to content
  • Kategorier
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
  1. Debatforum
  2. Kategorier
  3. Genmab
  4. Genmab — Februar 2024

Genmab — Februar 2024

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.6k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
    JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
    JørgenVarnæs
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #188

    What is the promise of the early stage pipeline? We have no idea

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
      JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
      JørgenVarnæs
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #189

      We have heard about solid tumors for quite some time now - but only seen glimpses of effect from tisutomab

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
        JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
        JørgenVarnæs
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #190

        Is there anything there? We don't know

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Offline
          E Offline
          E_L
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #191

          ok, we would all like to hear that, but you know that there is a very small chance that we will get info on that at the earnings report.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            E_L
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #192

            It comes when the data is ready , and preferably at a medical conference

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #193

              and to remind you , bringing out the early data on HexaCD38 wasn't exactly a very big success lol. my guess is that they will actually become even more carefull bringing out new
              data...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                JørgenVarnæs
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #194

                ...because data wasn't deemed to be very KYSO - in fact the data has changed market sentiment away from opt-in.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                  JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                  JørgenVarnæs
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #195

                  here we are in year 24 of GENs existence - CD38 is closed country, cd3cd20 is heavily contested by Roche - and little else to show

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E Offline
                    E Offline
                    E_L
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #196

                    Kesimpta, tepezza, tisotumab, talquetamab, teclistamab, amivantamab, these are not little drugs. the technology is there. But there is nobody that can guarantee a repeat, that is true.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                      JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                      JørgenVarnæs
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #197

                      ...with how much ownership? GEN is being traded as a bond with the royalties from dara and the cash holding as a foundation. Other than that, there is very little of value in the valuation

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                        JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                        JørgenVarnæs
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #198

                        KYSO must be about how much value GEN leaves on the table for the partners

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          E_L
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #199

                          which is why they want 50/50 partnerships in the future. which they hope to get from the stronger position they are in now. beter deals were not possible in the past , unfortunately

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                            JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                            JørgenVarnæs
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #200

                            Better deals were possible every step of the way

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                              JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                              JørgenVarnæs
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #201

                              GEN hasn't missed one single step in messing up values

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Sukkeralf
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #202

                                I think you are unbelievable harsh in your criticism of Genmab JV - its still one of the most successful biotechs in Europe

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                  JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                  JørgenVarnæs
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #203

                                  Seriously - take out dara and cash from the valuation and you are left with dust and tubleweeds. Is that the hallmark of a successful R&D organization?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                    JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                    JørgenVarnæs
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #204

                                    Its time GEN starts earning its keep for the shareholders

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • BulderB Offline
                                      BulderB Offline
                                      Bulder
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #205

                                      You cannot put a finger on the Scientific side of genmab. It’s been an unprecedented world class succes. Their wiilingness to pay out to shareholders however is far from satisfying.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                        JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                        JørgenVarnæs
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #206

                                        Please note, that I'm not questioning the quality of the research - I'm questioning the business decisions following the research

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                          JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                          JørgenVarnæs
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #207

                                          Am I completely wrong in saying, that the current GEN valuation is made up ENTIRELY from cash and expected dara-derived royalties?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Kategorier
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper