Skip to content
  • Kategorier
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
  1. Debatforum
  2. Kategorier
  3. Bavarian Nordic
  4. Bavarian Nordic — Januar 2023

Bavarian Nordic — Januar 2023

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Bavarian Nordic
1.1k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kraken23
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #816

    Meget interesseret at se hvordan det bliver vinklet på medwatch.dk, og hvordan-hvis bava responderer

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W Offline
      W Offline
      WorkTrader
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #817

      ..de to citater giver et noget andet billede, end det Hansi citerer...kunne være rart med et link.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Offline
        P Offline
        peter_frank
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #818

        Link Preview Image
        FDA vaccine advisers vote to harmonize Covid-19 vaccines in the United States | CNN

        A panel of independent experts that advises the US Food and Drug Administration on its vaccine decisions voted unanimously Thursday to update all Covid-19 vaccines so they contain the same ingredients as the two-strain shots that are now used as booster doses.

        favicon

        CNN (edition.cnn.com)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Offline
          P Offline
          peter_frank
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #819

          ..til omtalte artikel åp CNN...synes ikke den er negativ..

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • W Offline
            W Offline
            WorkTrader
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #820

            Perfekt tak...og helt enig. Det er ihvertfald en helt anden ordlyd, end den Hansi citerer...ville gerne se de nordea analyse.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • W Offline
              W Offline
              WorkTrader
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #821

              *den

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Cubinvest2021C Offline
                Cubinvest2021C Offline
                Cubinvest2021
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #822

                Er der nogen der kan sætte et link fra Nordea, hvor de udtaler det??

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Cubinvest2021C Offline
                  Cubinvest2021C Offline
                  Cubinvest2021
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #823

                  Jeg kan ikke se noget på Nordea Investor

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Cubinvest2021C Offline
                    Cubinvest2021C Offline
                    Cubinvest2021
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #824

                    Jeg skriver lige til Rolf og høre, om de kan udtale sig om den artikel

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • DarvinD Offline
                      DarvinD Offline
                      Darvin
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #825

                      Tror blot det er et udsnit fra et forvrøvlet Reuters udslip. Teksten har fuldkommen misforstået, hvad det handler om.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • DarvinD Offline
                        DarvinD Offline
                        Darvin
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #826

                        At man vil sikre sig en ensartet vaccinestrategi til efteråret 23. Det er fint, men konklusionen er ikke at det kun er mRNA bivalente vacciner. Nyere og bedre, som ABNCoV2, har naturligvis samme mulighed. Men at booster vaccineniveauet også skal gives ved første stik er fint

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H Offline
                          H Offline
                          Hansi1234
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #827

                          Jeg kan desværre ikke linke til analysen men kan poste lidt mere af teksten: . While this is not yet fully set in stone, it seems to be the most realistic scenario. Whether there will then be an option for ABNCoV2 to gain approval if the ph III study shows extremely strong data and much longer durability or if the vaccine can be modified, is now uncertain and a long shot in our view.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            Hansi1234
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #828

                            ABNCoV2 only makes up approx. DKK 35/share in our Bavarian Nordic valuation and if we look at Visible Alpha, consensus is only for DKK ~500m in risk-adjusted peak sales. Hence, the current share price does not reflect a lot of ABNCoV2 value, if any, in our view. Still the VRBPAC vote is negative news for ABNCoV2. It’s important to note however, that the European EMA has not made the same decision and we also see potential for ABNCoV2 in markets outside the US and EU.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Cubinvest2021C Offline
                              Cubinvest2021C Offline
                              Cubinvest2021
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #829

                              Jeg har lige skrevet til Rolf og pastet udtalelsen fra Nordea og linket til CNNs artikel. Jeg håber, at han svarer (sidste gang jeg skrev gjorde det han ikke)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Cubinvest2021C Offline
                                Cubinvest2021C Offline
                                Cubinvest2021
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #830

                                Nordea kan ikke anses for at være "kloge Åger"... dette må de snart kommentere på. Jeg kan ikke finde Nordeas analyse nogen steder, hellere ikke i Reuters.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  WorkTrader
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #831

                                  Gentager hvad afstemningen gik
                                  på, "The agency’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products committee voted 21-0 to recommend replacing the originally authorized Covid-19 vaccine regime with the bivalent version of the vaccine"

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Cubinvest2021C Offline
                                    Cubinvest2021C Offline
                                    Cubinvest2021
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #832

                                    @Hansi1234: hvor ser du den analyse hen? I Nordea Investor kommer alle udtalelser fra Reuters fremme og den sidste er fra d. 25. januar

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      CSørensen
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #833

                                      Her er mødereferatet fra Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting
                                      January 26, 2023 - FDA Briefing Document
                                      Future Vaccination Regimens Addressing COVID-19
                                      https://www.fda.gov/media/164699/download

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        CSørensen
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #834

                                        "Given the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants and associated changes in the epidemiology,
                                        susceptibility to reinfection, and waning of vaccine-induced immunity, barring development of a
                                        significantly improved vaccine, periodic future updates to the S protein sequence(s) contained
                                        or encoded in COVID-19 vaccines and revaccination will likely be needed to induce and
                                        maintain vac
                                        cine effectiveness (VE), respectively"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          CSørensen
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #835

                                          Interessant indskud: "barring development of a significantly improved vaccine"...

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Kategorier
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper