Skip to content
  • Debatforum
  • Seneste
  • Populære
  • Bruger
Temaer
  • Light
  • Dark

Kollaps
FORSIDEN
Log ind Opret konto

Genmab — Maj 2021

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Genmab
1.2k Indlæg 1 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • StockBullS Offline
    StockBullS Offline
    StockBull
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #30

    Ja det hele er lidt presset. M.t.h Genmab p.t og kan selvfølgelig også være andre aktier så er det altid sådan at der er masser af insiders som ved mere end os almindelige. Der er store investors som ved mere og som har networks, de kan købe info og de kan holde kursen som det passer dem og derved have en fordel overfor os almindelige. Tror bare man skal have is i maven det næste års tid

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • StockBullS Offline
      StockBullS Offline
      StockBull
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #31

      Tror også det er derfor Jan kommer med disse små indikationer om 2-3 dopling af kursen som support for de almindlige investors

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • StockBullS Offline
        StockBullS Offline
        StockBull
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #32

        ind til vidre har han jo haft ret

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V Offline
          V Offline
          Vitus
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #33

          Det vil ikke undre, hvis du også får ret StockBull....det har du jo før haft 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V Offline
            V Offline
            Vitus
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #34

            Det minder mig lidt om en bankgaranti.....

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Offline
              E Offline
              E_L
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #35

              Revlimid revenue Q1 $2.944bn, still amazing, but losing steam (last year Q4 was 3.280, Q1 2.915)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Offline
                E Offline
                E_L
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #36

                Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP)
                Minutes for the meeting on 16-18 March 2021 -interesting to read the reasons for declining orphan status for amivantamab last march https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/committee-orphan-medicinal-products-comp-meetings-2019-2020-2021_en.pdf

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Sukkeralf
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #37

                  Wrong link?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sukkeralf
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #38

                    Pfizer hits the brakes on their pivotal trial for a BCMA/CD3 bispecific on safety concerns, reports an FDA roadblock is holding up Duchenne MD PhIII

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Sukkeralf
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #39

                      https://endpts.com/pfizer-hits-the-brakes-on-their-pivotal-trial-for-a-bcma-cd3-bispecific-after-a-string-of-peripheral-neuropathy-cases/

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        E_L
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #40

                        correct link https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/minutes/minutes-comp-meeting-16-18-march-2021_en.pdf

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          E_L
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #41

                          good to know that at least 1 person tries to read
                          it 😉

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                            JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                            JørgenVarnæs
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #42

                            Thanks EL - seems this is the pertinent part: The variable nature of the EGFR mutations in the proposed condition and the overlap with other oncological conditions with EGFR alterations could not be clarified by the sponsor thus raising doubts about the distinctiveness of the proposed condition. There are no international classifications that define the proposed condition as unique.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                              JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                              JørgenVarnæs
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #43

                              It’s the EGFR “subset” of nscl that cannot be considered well-defined

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Offline
                                E Offline
                                E_L
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #44

                                yes, i would say it is a fair argument by EMA, we'll see if JNJ will appeal, but it is good that it is clarified, ie. the reason is not effectiveness or something like that, on the contrary, EMA seemed rather positive about the drug

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                  JørgenVarnæsJ Offline
                                  JørgenVarnæs
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #45

                                  I do find the EMA argumentation a bit confusing

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    E_L
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #46

                                    my interpretation is that JNJ tried to narrow the definition of the targeted disease to a small subsector of NSCLC in an attempt to get orphan status; in a nutshell: EMA rejects that subsector definition

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      E_L
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #47

                                      and NSCLC is too large a disease to fall under orphan

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BulderB Offline
                                        BulderB Offline
                                        Bulder
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #48

                                        I don't know how important an orphan designation is? Gives some priviliges, but else?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • BulderB Offline
                                          BulderB Offline
                                          Bulder
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #49

                                          Sponsors who obtain orphan designation benefit from protocol assistance, a type of scientific advice specific for designated orphan medicines, and market exclusivity once the medicine is on the market. Fee reductions are also available depending on the status of the sponsor and the type of service required. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/orphan-designation-overview

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Tilmeld Log ind

                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Debatforum
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Populære
                                          • Bruger